Talk:Plans set in motion for the removal of Bob Barr as the Libertarian Party's U.S. presidential nominee

Review 1

Revision 691669 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I'd be totally ok with this article if I can find just one more source confirming the motion to remove since the Post article has been used in the prior article and really only just gives a lead up to what caused this. So just find one more source and it's good. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Once again, good with it aside from sources. TUFKAAP (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 691669 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I'd be totally ok with this article if I can find just one more source confirming the motion to remove since the Post article has been used in the prior article and really only just gives a lead up to what caused this. So just find one more source and it's good. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Once again, good with it aside from sources. TUFKAAP (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

PS: The title is copyvio in my book at least. It's a near word-for-word copy of the source and the only one LP has been replaced with "Libertarian U.S.". —Calebrw (talk) 02:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's changed now, I did notice consider it... but that's what development's for.

Source/title fixed

I've renamed the article and found a new source. I've put this back under 'Review'. --WNewsReporter (talk) 02:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

New source added regarding the motion. --WNewsReporter (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Would it be possible to you to incorporate part of the motion into the article? That's what seems to be missing, if you add that, I would pass the article for peer review. PS: I will add a related news headers. —Calebrw (talk) 03:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Motion added. --WNewsReporter (talk) 03:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

REMOVAL MOTION

I think it really breaks up the article when it's in the middle. Maybe add it on the bottom after the full text of the article? Or maybe have a link to a separate page? --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Moved. —Calebrw (talk) 03:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 03:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure —Calebrw (talk) 03:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Review 2

Revision 691744 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Great additions since the last review. I like the fact that the whole motion is posted. The mostion could be placed at the end, but that's the only thing I could think to change. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 691744 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Great additions since the last review. I like the fact that the whole motion is posted. The mostion could be placed at the end, but that's the only thing I could think to change. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Thanks for the review and help. --WNewsReporter (talk) 03:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Heads up

This, in response to an e-mail Phillies says he received from LP spokesman Andrew Davis saying there is “no truth” to the claims made in a WikiNews article about the possibility of Barr’s removal.

• "Libertarian Party spokesman: ‘Barr will not be removed’" — Austin Cassidy's Independent Political Report, September 16, 2008

Cirt (talk) 22:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Everything in that article was sourced. I'm pretty sure that Davis was lying to save face. --WNewsReporter (talk) 22:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)