Talk:Princess Yuriko of Mikasa, Japan's oldest royal family member, dies at 101

Review of revision 4804956 [Not ready]

Revision 4804956 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Thank you for your first article written here. Please note we have a style guide at WN:Style. Some of the issues that need to be addressed are ordinal numbers such as "15th" and time conversion to UTC. Please read through the style guide and revisit the article to correct any other style issues. This article would benefit from breaking the content up into multiple paragraphs. This is also discussed in the style guide, namely around the WN:PYRAMID of article structure. Non-English aources should be indicated using the lang= parameter per WN:Source. That policy also requires guidance in the talk page regarding the use and translation of non-English sources. The headline should also be adjusted per Wikinews:Style_guide#Headlines. To rename articles, use the "Move" link. Let me know if you have any questions. It can be a steep learning curve for the first few articles. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4804956 of this article has been reviewed by Michael.C.Wright (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: Thank you for your first article written here. Please note we have a style guide at WN:Style. Some of the issues that need to be addressed are ordinal numbers such as "15th" and time conversion to UTC. Please read through the style guide and revisit the article to correct any other style issues. This article would benefit from breaking the content up into multiple paragraphs. This is also discussed in the style guide, namely around the WN:PYRAMID of article structure. Non-English aources should be indicated using the lang= parameter per WN:Source. That policy also requires guidance in the talk page regarding the use and translation of non-English sources. The headline should also be adjusted per Wikinews:Style_guide#Headlines. To rename articles, use the "Move" link. Let me know if you have any questions. It can be a steep learning curve for the first few articles. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4805197 [Not ready]

Revision 4805197 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: English sources required NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Sources must be in English as well, please. And: What is the deal with that tsunami of source articles? I mean: the article spans 9 sentences and there are enough source articles to choke a horse. It isn't "wrong" -- I just don't get it. Not trying to be jerk -- I'm just curious about the author's motivation. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4805197 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: English sources required NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Sources must be in English as well, please. And: What is the deal with that tsunami of source articles? I mean: the article spans 9 sentences and there are enough source articles to choke a horse. It isn't "wrong" -- I just don't get it. Not trying to be jerk -- I'm just curious about the author's motivation. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4805344 [Passed]

Revision 4805344 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Newsworthiness is on the brink of stale. I recommend effort to get story oublished on same date as event. Current policies allow a delay of up to 7 days. I am happy to see previous review comments addressed. Further edits are welcome for 24 hours after publishing, and will be reviewed separately. Thanks to all contributors. 👍 😊 🙏 The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4805344 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Newsworthiness is on the brink of stale. I recommend effort to get story oublished on same date as event. Current policies allow a delay of up to 7 days. I am happy to see previous review comments addressed. Further edits are welcome for 24 hours after publishing, and will be reviewed separately. Thanks to all contributors. 👍 😊 🙏 The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 4805345 [Passed]

Revision 4805345 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thanks for improvements. I am happy previous review comments have been addressed On brink of being stale, ideally write and publish on day of event Policies allow up to 7 days delay Thanks to all contributors 👍 The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4805345 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thanks for improvements. I am happy previous review comments have been addressed On brink of being stale, ideally write and publish on day of event Policies allow up to 7 days delay Thanks to all contributors 👍 The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Headline incorrect

The headline is incorrectly punctuated and the phrase "Yuriko the princess Mikasa" is unique to our article.

A quick google search indicates a few different ways to refer to the princess:

Princess Yuriko[1]

Princess Yuriko Mikasa[2]

Yuriko, Princess Mikasa[3]

The discrepancy could be due to translation.

If it is part of a title or how royalty is commonly addressed in Japan, commas are needed, as in "Japan's oldest princess, Yuriko, the Princess Mikasa, dies".

Headlines are also down-cased or downstyle capitalization, such as a sentence. Wikinews:Style_guide#Headlines

I can move it within 24 hours of publication, depending on what the author or others suggest. Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 18:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

"a few different ways" does not mean this way is incorrect

why/how down capital? i think names, word princess - need to have caps

thank you 🙂 Gryllida (talk) 18:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

"a few different ways" does not mean this way is incorrect I'll rephrase it; What is the appropriate formal way to address or refer to a princess of the Imperial House of Japan?

why/how down capital? Why? The only reason I can give is because that is what the style guide states. It gives no reason:

Use downstyle capitalisation — Downstyle capitalisation, also called sentence case, is the preferred style. Only the initial word and proper nouns are capitalized.

How? In the case of our article here, the first instance of the word princess is not part a formal title or a proper noun. It is a common noun[4]; Japan's oldest princess. The word princess describes a type of person.

That is in addition to the additional commas that are needed to make the headline a correct sentence. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 21:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

The title used, in English, by the Prime Minister is Princess Yuriko of Mikasa[5]. That is authoritative enough for me. I have moved the page. I was hoping the original author would have done that as they are new to en.WN and it would help them learn the ropes. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 14:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)