Talk:South African Civil Aviation Authority attributes helicopter crash to 'unsecured' penguin in the cabin
Add topicReview of revision 4849697 [Not ready]
[edit]  |
Revision 4849697 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: At least two independent sources are required. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4849697 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: At least two independent sources are required. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Suggested headline
[edit]- Helicopter crash in South Africa blamed on 'unsecured' penguin
- South African Civil Aviation Authority blames helicopter crash on 'unsecured' penguin
Better? Gryllida (talk) 11:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Review of revision 4849872 [Not ready]
[edit]| |
Revision 4849872 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: 90% copy pasted from first source. This looks like possible copyright violation. :-( Please rewrite in your own words now and re-submit for review. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4849872 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: 90% copy pasted from first source. This looks like possible copyright violation. :-( Please rewrite in your own words now and re-submit for review. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 4850014 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 4850014 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Thanks to Myspaceisscience for the original submission, and to Wikiwide for the article rewrite, addition of formatting and images. I've verified the key 5Ws and neutrality and copyright and consider the current revision passes the requirements. Post publish edits need to be made and approved by a reviewer within 24 hours of publication; anything beyond this time will need to be added as {{correction}}, if required. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4850014 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Thanks to Myspaceisscience for the original submission, and to Wikiwide for the article rewrite, addition of formatting and images. I've verified the key 5Ws and neutrality and copyright and consider the current revision passes the requirements. Post publish edits need to be made and approved by a reviewer within 24 hours of publication; anything beyond this time will need to be added as {{correction}}, if required. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Copyright material not removed
[edit]{{editprotected}}
The following phrases[1] are identical to or scuffed-up versions of phrases in the UPI article[2].
- "The SACAA's incident report said the pilot and three human passengers..."
- "...landed on Bird Island, off the Eastern Cape, on January 19..."
- "...and a passenger described as a "specialist" placed a penguin from the island in a cardboard box and brought it aboard the aircraft."
- "The report said the helicopter, which landed on its side,"
The following is near-verbatim (scuffed up):
- "The passenger occupying the left front seat of the helicopter put the box on his lap, but he lost his grip on it just after take-off and the box slid into the pilot's cyclic pitch control lever as the helicopter was approximately 15m above the ground. The lever was pushed to the far-right position, causing the helicopter to roll to the right."
I propose the following correction statement be posted after the plagiarism is removed:
This article previously included copyrighted material copied from a source. The content has been removed. Wikinews regrets the oversight.
The reviewer previously identified 90% copyrighted material, which I believe warranted deletion and a fresh start by the author.
- I do not believe the plagiarism has been adequately addressed in this article. The following statements are still similar[3] to source material and may form a pattern of close paraphrasing or "scuffed up" plagiarism:
- "...passengers landed on Bird Island..."
- "...a "specialist" placed a penguin from the island in a cardboard box..."
- The following still contains three verbatim phrases from a source (highlighted):
- "The passenger occupying the left front seat of the helicopter put the box on his lap, but he couldn't hold it in the first several seconds after the take-off. The box fell, and hit the pilot's cyclic pitch control lever..."
- Individually, these phrases may seem minor, but in aggregate they create a pattern that resembles close paraphrasing. To maintain our editorial standards, it may be worth rephrasing further to clearly distinguish our wording from the source. —Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Reviewer) 16:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
