Talk:Teen hacker admits to attack on scientology.org
I have not linked to the final source as it is clearly advocating illegal actions and i bet that if we linked to it we would get in some sort of legal trouble. Anonymous101talk 16:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Project Chanology Website : <no longer linked> (I do not advise you to visit any illegal pages)Anonymous101talk 16:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Per discussion on IRC I have removed all content cited to the final source, and the source has also been removed. Anonymous101talk 16:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Review[edit]
 |
Revision 712944 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 16:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 712944 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 16:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
What did he do?[edit]
Was he a key player, or are the police really so useless that it is a big deal to get an entire member of a DDoS attack? The article doesn't currently say, it simply says he was 'involved'. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)