Talk:U.S. commuter blows up section of Washington D.C. Bridge

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shouldn't Mr Ruefly be referred to as such throughout the article? Just calling him "Ruefly" seems rude to me --Yaf201 15:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Just a question...[edit]

Is the articel title supposed to be this ambiguous? It makes it hard to tell that it was legit... 68.39.174.238 16:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree, "U.S. commuter blows up section of Washington D.C. Bridge" is more than a little bit sensationalist. Rob T Firefly 16:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

misleading headline----[edit]

---initial reaction is: Oh no the terrorists strike again! My suggestion would be to replace 'blows up' by 'demolishes'

Agreed, my first reaction was "what the heck? why isn't this the main story???" Then I read the article and realizr that it was planned, not that some random guy (or perhaps terrorist) set off a bomb on a commuter bridge. I agree with the above suggstion. Matt White 17:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm in on this one. FellowWikiNews (W) 17:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm torn between the fact that the headline is slightly misleading, and the fact that the story behind it is quite well written as a compliment to it. I spotted the headline in Recent Changes and had to read the article to find out more. It brought a smile to my face as I discovered this was planned and the guy had won a competition to push the button. I think "demolishes" would probably have the same draw to readers, but I'm not going to change it. ;-) --Brian McNeil / talk 18:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Excellent. Wikinews is becoming a tabloid so gradually that no one will notice until it's too late. I think it's time to re-open the discussion about including a page six girl. TRWBW 02:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)