Talk:UK Wikinews Shorts: December 22, 2009
Review of revision 926239 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 926239 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I did add one sentence of info but I think I'm allright to review. It was a tiny addition. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 926239 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I did add one sentence of info but I think I'm allright to review. It was a tiny addition. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Downstyle[edit]
I disagree with the downstyle on 'shorts'. Every single other Shorts is upper case; unless you fancy changing everything in that category and convincing everyone that a regular feature is no longer a proper noun it should be changed back. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 16:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I second Sandman's rename. It's a proper noun, should be capitalised. Tempodivalse [talk] 17:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments page[edit]
What happened to the comments page of this article before it was moved? Will this page get moved as well? --Rayboy8 (my talk) (my contributions) 16:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to move this article back since Julian hasn't replied yet (not a complaint; you ain't exactly had long). The two will then match up again. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 16:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)