Talk:US Navy Secretary nominee Phelan outlines readiness, cost-cutting reforms in Senate hearing

Notes for reviewer

This article was initially drafted with the assistance of ChatGPT-4o.

I have verified all factual statements and added hidden, inline citations using {{verify}} where necessary. In accordance with WN:AI, I have ensured that the latest version of the article underwent substantive human editorial oversight. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 18:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

"His nomination has drawn scrutiny due to his lack of military experience." from whom? Gryllida (talk) 22:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Stacie Pettyjohn. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 00:33, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Review of revision 4842305 [Passed]

Revision 4842305 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Publishing Clarification requested at talk, about the last sentence of the first paragraph. Active voice would be nice to have there. It would be nice to add a one or two sentence paragraph at the end of the article, clarifying what 'confirmation hearing' is and how it works. Why was it required now? And what's next after this hearing? What are the next planned steps? Hope that some of these changes can be made within the 24-hour window from now. Thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4842305 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Publishing Clarification requested at talk, about the last sentence of the first paragraph. Active voice would be nice to have there. It would be nice to add a one or two sentence paragraph at the end of the article, clarifying what 'confirmation hearing' is and how it works. Why was it required now? And what's next after this hearing? What are the next planned steps? Hope that some of these changes can be made within the 24-hour window from now. Thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Reply

Gryllida, I have added a statement at the end to explain what the next steps are. They will need to be reviewed and sighted with 24 hours after publication. My source for the statement is the Navy Times.[1] —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Reviewer) 14:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Sighted. Added my edit: past tense and removed verify template. Please check. Gryllida (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2025 (UTC)