Talk:Ukraine says it recaptured lost ground in war with Russia

Note to reviewer

If the talks in Istanbul conclude before this is published, some re-writing may be necessary. --SVTCobra 03:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Pfft, with me reviewing? Not a chance! JJLiu112 (talk) 07:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4670916 [Not ready]

Revision 4670916 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: WatPo is...get ready...paywalled! NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4670916 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: WatPo is...get ready...paywalled! NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

@JJLiu112:, Washington Post is paywalled for you? I just reloaded the article and I see it in full. I am not even under a free registration. Do they have a "free article limit" which you exceeded? Well, nevertheless, I am sure I can find a substitute sources. --SVTCobra 04:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

At the risk of not removing everything from WaPo, I am resubmitting with a new source and parts re-written. --SVTCobra 05:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, yes, the Washington Post is paywalled for me. I apologise for the inconvenience. JJLiu112 (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Don't apologize, it is by no means your fault. Cheers, SVTCobra 05:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4670938 [Passed]

Revision 4670938 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4670938 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

typo in title

recapured 2A02:8085:C13F:C180:B1FF:5912:2034:C251 (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

@JJLiu112: Just noticed this, and it does appear that there is a typo in the title - "recapured" should be spelt "recaptured", so informing you as the reviewer. LivelyRatification (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh my God...yes, please change the title, admin. JJLiu112 (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Done --SVTCobra 02:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)