Talk:Wikinews interviews Brenton Clutterbuck, candidate for the electorate of Maroochydore at the upcoming Queensland election

OR

Notes sent to scoop. --RockerballAustralia (talk) 23:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Grammar checks...

I am not sure of Wikinews policy on dialects. I did change spelling though.

As the interview was via phone, would any of these corrections be inline with the taped version?

• What would the three main policies you are taking into this election?

• Change to...What would be the three main policies you are taking into this election?

• You should always do what’s best interests of the electorate

• You should always do what’s in the best interests of the electorate.

• There is no merit to it, or to labors propose to invest in uranium.

• There is no merit to it, or to labor's proposal to invest in uranium.

• Big business should not directing policy

• Big business should not be directing policy ...OR
• Big business should not direct policy

• Where there is a COI should always respect the community.

• Change to I dunno...

• As I said before, big business should not directing policy.

• As I said before, big business should not be directing policy.... OR
• As I said before, big business should not direct policy.

• What is a LNP, what is a COI?

Cool little interview BTW SriMesh | talk 01:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately there is no taped version. I used my home phone for it (i'd lost my mobile, which is able to record conversations). I'm not sure if my home phone can record converstions.

i'm changing the grammar as needed now --RockerballAustralia (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

If this is how the questions were presented to the person being interviewed, then I don't think Grammar is too much of an issue. Changing the format of questions, after they have already been answered is IMO not too much of a good idea. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 11:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

The policy one just needed the minor fix to present it as it was given to the interviewee --RockerballAustralia (talk) 01:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 783388 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 783388 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.