Talk:Wikinews interviews Spanish Paralympic track and field athlete David Casinos

Journalist notes

Laura Hale interviews David Casinos for Wikinews

Raystorm transcribed this for me. The on the spot translations were done by Spanish athlete Salvador Cano Garcia. My other translators were not available. Raystorm has advised me that... his translations, while well meaning, are not accurate. There were some major translation problems, with one question being asked all wrong. Inline notes have been included to explain the translation decisions. This largely pertains to the question around shoes.

I have e-mailed scoop with the competitor list provided to me by the CPE. this source verifies the start date.

I conducted this interview at the Madrid airport earlier today after it was arranged by the CPE. I wrote the article about Alberto Suárez Laso for English and Simple English Wikipedia. I used this research as the basis for this interview. (Though I kind of blanked at the moment. 27 names and histories floating around my brain.)

Interview in audio format for verification. --LauraHale (talk) 17:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Because the file on scoop has gotten corrupted somehow, and I've never been able to get my mail client to read scoop, I have no way of verifying his classifications or events. --Pi zero (talk) 01:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

(Clarification: The reason it matters that I haven't been able to get my mail client to read scoop is that if I had, it would have loaded the file days ago, before it got corrupted.) --Pi zero (talk) 01:30, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1960400 [Passed]

Revision 1960400 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The snafu with the info on scoop (detailed above) is frustrating, but since the event starts today (presumably in a few hours), I decided rather than waiting to comment out the unverified material and run the article. I added a note about the question that was different in Spanish; it didn't seem the question could be left out since the following question would go with it and its answer has nontrivial content, while leaving it in without a note that English readers can see would be depriving them of context they need to try to make sense of the dialog. If they then have trouble figuring out the following answer, that's informed confusion (having listened to the audio, methinks confusion is an appropriate informed response). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1960400 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The snafu with the info on scoop (detailed above) is frustrating, but since the event starts today (presumably in a few hours), I decided rather than waiting to comment out the unverified material and run the article. I added a note about the question that was different in Spanish; it didn't seem the question could be left out since the following question would go with it and its answer has nontrivial content, while leaving it in without a note that English readers can see would be depriving them of context they need to try to make sense of the dialog. If they then have trouble figuring out the following answer, that's informed confusion (having listened to the audio, methinks confusion is an appropriate informed response). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.