Talk:Works valued at €100 million stolen from the Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris

Notes[edit]

'Deputy culture secretary at the Paris Town Hall, Christophe Girard told a press conference' - Was this the deputy culture secretary of France speaking at the Paris Town hall, the deputy culture secretary of Paris speaking at a press conference, or the deputy culture secretary of the Town Hall speaking at the conference?

'The theft was discovered at approximately 7a.m. local time (9a.m. UTC) by museum staff.' UTC is behind Paris time, right? So, I think it should be 9 AM local, and 7 AM UTC, and use AM instead of 9a.m.

'An unnamed source told The Daily Telegraph: "It's an enormous crime, one of the biggest in art history"' Even I know that, why an unnamed source? Griffinofwales (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

First corrected per his article on fr.wikipedia, second was my cack-handed (and backward) UTC offsetting. As for the last, I'm not sure what to do about that- I quit elike the quote, but there's nobody to attribute it to (hence "unnamed source"). Any thoughts? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

If you think it's ok, then I'll go with it. This article is officially criticiser approved. Let me go get a reviewer :). Griffinofwales (talk) 22:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll go and review the article, then :) --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 23:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1024549 [Passed][edit]

Revision 1024549 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:51, 20 May 2010 (UTC).

Copyright: Passed
Newsworthiness: Passed
Verifiability: Passed
NPOV: Passed
Style: Passed

Comments by reviewer: Per Griffinofwales' ~~review~~ criticisms :P

The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.