Talk:Works valued at €100 million stolen from the Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris

Notes

• 'Deputy culture secretary at the Paris Town Hall, Christophe Girard told a press conference' - Was this the deputy culture secretary of France speaking at the Paris Town hall, the deputy culture secretary of Paris speaking at a press conference, or the deputy culture secretary of the Town Hall speaking at the conference?

• 'The theft was discovered at approximately 7a.m. local time (9a.m. UTC) by museum staff.' UTC is behind Paris time, right? So, I think it should be 9 AM local, and 7 AM UTC, and use AM instead of 9a.m.

• 'An unnamed source told The Daily Telegraph: "It's an enormous crime, one of the biggest in art history"' Even I know that, why an unnamed source? Griffinofwales (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

First corrected per his article on fr.wikipedia, second was my cack-handed (and backward) UTC offsetting. As for the last, I'm not sure what to do about that- I quit elike the quote, but there's nobody to attribute it to (hence "unnamed source"). Any thoughts? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

If you think it's ok, then I'll go with it. This article is officially criticiser approved. Let me go get a reviewer :). Griffinofwales (talk) 22:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll go and review the article, then :) --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 23:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1024549 [Passed]

Revision 1024549 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:51, 20 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Per Griffinofwales' review criticisms :P The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1024549 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:51, 20 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Per Griffinofwales' review criticisms :P The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.