Do we really want to be the Anonymous News Network?

Here are some other comments about recent articles on this subject:

• "Good journalism. Presents both sides of the story, backs up everything with references." - 216.195.213.51 (talk · contribs)
• "Great article...would love to see more on this topic." - 24.128.255.141 (talk · contribs)
• "Sadly, there's only been 3 Scientology articles this year." - Mikemoral (talk · contribs)
• "Very balanced article. Would like to see more about Scientology here, too. In fact, the thing I love about Wikinews is the references/sources, something that no other news site does.."
• "I thank the Wikinews staff and volunteers for posting this. It is important news regarding the fight against that dangerous, brainwashing cult." - 187.112.127.134 (talk · contribs)
• "Very nicely informative article." - 76.173.234.126 (talk · contribs)
• "Great article, thank you!" - Petter Bøckman (talk · contribs)
• "Very interesting article and interview. Well done." - Tristan Thomas (talk · contribs)

Thank you. Such comments are most appreciated. Especially after the efforts put into researching the subject matter, successfully conducting the interview and copyediting, and putting the entire article together. :)

I also think this is an excellent interview about a very important and largely hidden subject - the best way to prevent abuse of this kind is to publicise it widely. Excalibur (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!