Thank you for fucking up the NPOV, and shifting the focus, and incomplete information

Jump to navigation Jump to search

TBH. 100% honest. It was the disappointment when not all cities in the state observed bandh. It was sincere (but betrayed a POV) and described as a "flop". Don't know if you recall that message.

SVTCobra22:35, 28 January 2018

Having an opinion does not imply non-neutral news writing. An intelligent person generally does have an opinion, but if they understand how to write neutrally for Wikinews, their opinion should rarely get in the way of their writing, and they'll usually know when it's a problem. (I remember brianmc declining to write about the Scottish independence referendum.)

Pi zero (talk)00:14, 29 January 2018

Amit Shah has various roles to play. He, Narendra Modi, and Rahul Gandhi would be coming to Karnataka for the upcoming state election in late April, or early May. The opinions of Shah like finding the murderers from hell, or the corrupt government, etc can be discussed indefinitely. There is no stopping. Not mentioning it is hiding important information since things are not mentioned in the context, and what is mentioned requires more explanation which would distract the focus. There needs to be a proper flow, and change a lot of things to present that information, which will require significant structural change. The way sati pratha or the pork/beef was discussed in the Triple Talaq article -- there needs to be a clear difference between what is relevant, fresh and to the context, and what is not directly relevant to the story or needs a proper set up. The difference is just like Marvel Cinematic Universe vs DC universe.

•–•05:19, 30 January 2018