Comments from feedback form - "incredibly leading questions. ..."

Because I have little knowledge about the political situation in Greece, I have found the interview interesting even without arguing.

But I do think that playing the role of advocatus diaboli is considered a good habit in journalism, not a bias.

Even the toughest pros (Paxman, Humphrys) ask leading questions now and again. I think the tactic of asking a sympathetic warm-up question ("slavish pursuit of free-market capitalism") is risky: in this case the interviewee felt able to wrap her answer up in Marxist jargon.

I do agree on that one. The first question should have been different.