Comments from feedback form - "This case dealt with intention..."

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Much as I despise the Wesboro church and its members, I have to agree that it is important to uphold these freedoms. The more you ban real hate speech, the easier it is to twist otherwise offensive speech into "hate speech". Clear definitions just aren't enough here. Ignoring these people is the best solution, in the long run; censoring them turns them into martyrs and rebels.

139.18.198.30 (talk)06:23, 4 March 2011

As abhorrent as the Westboro Church's actions are, the judges chose correctly. Their First Amendment rights must not be infringed upon just because we don't like what they say or how they say it.

74.212.26.6 (talk)13:12, 4 March 2011

Hey, if people counter-protest against them, they can't do anything much about it. It's their free-speech rights.

50.46.150.65 (talk)17:52, 5 March 2011
 

yes let us continue letting people be free, for we all know that the public is sooo smart. let them have kids and let them teach their kids so 200 years down the road we are more fucked up then we are now. soical freedom is long past us if we will continue as a race.

The protesters should have been "removed" from the gene pool and still should be.

Crazynomad (talk)17:58, 8 March 2011