User:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr/Wikinews policy

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Table
Language Original Reporting Accreditation Relative date use Archival policies Reviewing Never Assume / AGF / Interaction Local file upload policy Synthesis Republished Content

en
English

Articles need to be verifiable based on author notes[1]. Demonstrate commitment to values, be a Wikimedian in good standing, have contributed substantially to Wikinews articles.
Handled by en.wn[2].
Used in text. Not used in sources or dateline[3]. Twenty-four hours after publication, major fixes require use of a correction notice. After seven days, articles are locked from editing[4]. Rigorous source-checking with good understanding of sources language(s). Reviewers limited to article edits small enough to avoid becoming a notable contributor.[5] Relatively recent as explicit guideline; pragmatic underpinning of community interactions and reviewing[6]. Local upload enabled for Fair use; media from 'competing' publishers prohibited. Copywritten publicity shots, screenshots, CC-BY-NC and GoL allowed[7]. Require at least two sources from other news organizations[8]. Must present this content in new way/perspective while meeting publishing guidelines[9]. Third-party content not republished; all content requires multiple independent sources, and subjected to local review process[10].

ar
العربية

No policy page of either Assume Good Faith or never assume.

bg
български

Принципи и политика на акредитиране. No policy page of either assume good faith or never assume.

bs
bosanski

ca
català

No policy page of either assume good faith or never assume.

cs
čeština

de
Deutsch

Originäre Berichterstattung No protection is used for older articles, but a list by month and year of articles is kept using the DynamicPageList feature. Hilfe:Veröffentlichung describes how articles are published. There is no formal review procedure, but a two hour waiting period is required between the initial draft and the published article for other users to edit or raise concerns. Assume Good Faith policy exists on the project.

el
Ελληνικά

No policy page of either assume good faith or never assume.

eo
Esperanto

No policy page of either assume good faith or never assume.

es
español

Reportajes originales Contribute 10 original reports, edit 100 news articles, demonstrate understanding of key policies including NPOV. Handled locally on es.wn. Archivado de artículos. Wikinoticias:Revisión de artículos No policy page of either assume good faith or never assume.

fa
فارسی

ویکی‌خبر:خبر_دست_اول Not vigorous. Project mainly maintained by people outside Iran[11]. Appears to have adopted a form of AGF.

fi
suomi

Assume Good Faith is listed as a policy page.

fr
français

Reportage original Demonstrate commitment to values, be a Wikimedian in good standing, have contributed substantially to Wikinews articles.
Handled by en.wn.

he
עברית

ויקיחדשות:דיווח_מקורי

it
italiano

Notizie originali Convenzioni di archiviazione. No policy page of either assume good faith or never assume.

ja
日本語

ウィキニュース:独自の取材 ウィキニュース:査読

ko
한국어

위키뉴스:단독 보도

no
norsk

Førstehandsrapportering-nn

pl
polski

Materiał autorski

pt
português

Reportagens originais

ro
română

Condiţii de arhivare.

ru
русский

OR is not verified. Accredication is not currently used. Relative dates same as at en, Reviewing same as at en (except admins can self-publish). AGF/NA is absent at this scale, they look at context, Synthesis is lax and can work as a c/p from one free external source without requirement of two sources. Republishes third party content.

sq
shqip

sr
српски / srpski

Оригинални прилог

sv
svenska

ta
தமிழ்

No policy page of either assume good faith or never assume.

th
ไทย

tr
Türkçe

Özgün haber Arşivleme politikası.

uk
українська

zh
中文

原创报导 存檔常規

Notes[edit]

  1. Reporter's notes may include images, audio, video, emails (need not be publicly shared, must be available to reviewer). Talk page original reporting section should make reference to other media or email.
  2. Accreditation, issuing of @wikinewsie.org email, and access credentials to the site, has – in some circumstances – been extended to contributors on other-language projects where a review process is in active use and a corresponding accreditation request/approval process exists.
  3. "Absolute" dates (eg: April 20, 2024) are considered 'encyclopedic' and on-project experience is such are jarring in the context of a news report. Relative dates encourage active voice, and are a common journalistic convention.
    Examples would be: 'yesterday', 'last Friday', 'this weekend'; more vague forward-looking references may be used – such as 'early next month'.
  4. Full protection at seven days old instigated for multiple reasons: limits opportunities for vandalism; deter well-meaning - but contrary to policy - changes made with the benefit of hindsight; prevent/highlight removal of images from Commons (which may-well be suitable for local upload).
  5. Sources are checked for verification, neutrality, and non-plagiarism, this requires significantly better understanding of sources than automatic translation provides.
  6. AGF is judged overly idealistic, and counter to journalistic principles of "trust, but verify".
  7. Content creators may not adopt Fair Use (-NC, -ND, GoL) for their own work; efforts should be made to obtain the most-liberal license terms with 3rd-party media.
  8. The ideal is each key fact being verified from two independent sources; this frequently highlights conflicting figures (eg death tolls) and enables Wikinews reportage to be more-informative and accurate.
  9. This includes, but is not limited to, avoiding plagiarism such as copied sentences with a few word changes and reordering; and, following a source's flow/order of presenting facts.
  10. This constraint introduced to avoid issues of a single source, regardless of license, being liable to have non-obvious neutrality problems.
  11. A native speaker, when asked about article quality, said the use Farsi was rather poor and looked as-if written by people taught the language whilst growing up outside the country. They observed numerous grammatical errors, which may suggest a non-thorough review process.