User talk:Dorey Sébastien/Volunteer during the Ubuntu Party Cité des Sciences et de l'Indusrie Paris France Europe 20140524-25

Review of revision 2648014 [Not ready]

Revision 2648014 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Thin; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: What kind of article is this intended to be? It appears to be at least partly original reporting, but there are no reporter's notes, and no {{original}} tag in the Sources section. There isn't enough text for an ordinary text article, nor are there enough pictures to make a photo essay. The lede doesn't explain the nature of the event, and the article text contains external links, which we don't allow in the body of an article (we only allow wikilinks in the article text, and the text should be self-contained rather than requiring the reader to follow links to understand the essence of the story; external links should be in the Sources section if information in the article is drawn from them, or otherwise in an External links section after the Sources section). Part of the article text is written in first person, which is not news style. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2648014 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Thin; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: What kind of article is this intended to be? It appears to be at least partly original reporting, but there are no reporter's notes, and no {{original}} tag in the Sources section. There isn't enough text for an ordinary text article, nor are there enough pictures to make a photo essay. The lede doesn't explain the nature of the event, and the article text contains external links, which we don't allow in the body of an article (we only allow wikilinks in the article text, and the text should be self-contained rather than requiring the reader to follow links to understand the essence of the story; external links should be in the Sources section if information in the article is drawn from them, or otherwise in an External links section after the Sources section). Part of the article text is written in first person, which is not news style. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 2649322 [Not ready]

Revision 2649322 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Problematic; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Additional pictures have been provided, as requested. Unfortunately, there doesn't appear to be anything much here about the meeting; it's a photo essay about catering an event. In all honesty, I don't think this passes the car-crash test. Other concerns from the first review have not been addressed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2649322 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Problematic; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Additional pictures have been provided, as requested. Unfortunately, there doesn't appear to be anything much here about the meeting; it's a photo essay about catering an event. In all honesty, I don't think this passes the car-crash test. Other concerns from the first review have not been addressed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 2650107 [Not ready]

Revision 2650107 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: See below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: I don't see that changes made since the preceding review have mitigated the concerns raised. The WN:CARCRASH program seems unchanged, and the other concerns remain afaics unaddressed since the first review. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2650107 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: See below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: I don't see that changes made since the preceding review have mitigated the concerns raised. The WN:CARCRASH program seems unchanged, and the other concerns remain afaics unaddressed since the first review. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.