User talk:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
(Redirected from User talk:LauraHale)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!

It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.

-- Cirt (talk) 21:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


The Original Barnstar
I, Bddpaux, hereby award you this barnstar for your training materials, which are extremely cool!!

--Bddpaux (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Did I say extremely cool?![edit]

I meant super-exceptionally extremely cool! That's some serious design work. I am such a hack when it comes to stuff like that!! --Bddpaux (talk) 21:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Litigation for Varanasi Heritage intensifies[edit]

2154638 Please check the talk page history before reviewing.User:Rahulkepapa 17:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)~ I agree with the removal of unessential interviews. I have added some relevant categories. Two are new. May be removed if now are too many

Done ! Thenks for the suggestions ---- Rahulkepapa (talk) 09:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


Seems like an RFP thing, not a water-cooler thing, to me. Is community discussion called for? --Pi zero (talk) 15:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Could be either. The conference session made it clear that wherever the the process is, it needs to be only for this particular thing. I originally had it placed on the water cooler for miscellaneous. But yeah, having it as a request for a specific right request instead of a water cooler discussion would be good, especially if it appeared in the recent changes like other requests for rights. --LauraHale (talk) 16:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
A page specifically for requesting this particular priv? Well, we gave flaggedrevs privs a separate page. And hooking it into {{votings}} should be straightforward. --Pi zero (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes, because educators need it to be easy to find. Also, it puts a burden on the community so we need resources to handle it. --LauraHale (talk) 17:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


--Bddpaux (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Speier article[edit]

By-and-large, what we're looking at here is an extremely short interview article. That's fine and certainly newsworthy in all respects, but it just troubles me as to why she (or her handlers) only answered two of your questions (another reason why I personally loathe interviewing via e-mail...... I mean, do you think Walter Cronkite ever had to put up with crap like that?).....anyhoo, I tweaked the lede just a smidge.....I read through it twice and there was just something non-neutral in its tone....I couldn't put my finger on it, but it was there.

I like to add actual quotes to the interviewee's statements.--Bddpaux (talk) 04:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Yeah. Well, she answered them which is better than others. I am going to the Paralympic Games with US media accreditation. I want to be able to write about the US Paralympics in advance as my coverage of them is limited. The interview was longer but not all questions answered. Alas and woe. Still, no one else has commented on the Paralympics period in a general sense that I can see from the US House and one comment on the record is nice. I know of a case or two involving complaints about classification where congress people stepped in but that is it. --LauraHale (talk) 06:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks much[edit]

Thank you for this article.

It'd be great to see additional interesting articles about this member of Congress.


-- Cirt (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

 :) No problem. Her media person took my request seriously enough to provide responses, unlike some other congresspeople. Not sure how much follow up I would do on them but if others do, then I can pass along contact info. --LauraHale (talk) 17:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you could do another article on her about other different topics in the future. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 18:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Cristiano Ronaldo tops Neymar and Messi on most valuable Wikipedia edits[edit]

This isn't as easy as it seemed earlier (and it didn't see exactly "easy" then). As a reviewer, my hope is to clearly explain what the difficulty is and how to move forward — but we're in unfamiliar territory so I don't actually know as much as I'd like to about where to go from here. I tried my best; review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Fundosa ONCE defeats Servigest Burgos 80-20 in Spain's top wheelchair basketball league‎[edit]

I'd badly underestimated how long the Common Weal article would take. --Pi zero (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

User:LauraHale/As Australia's men prepare for FIFA World Cup, few women contributing to articles about Australia's women's team[edit]

Moved to userspace, since it's OR. --Pi zero (talk) 16:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Cristiano Ronaldo tops Neymar and Messi on most valuable Wikipedia edits[edit]

Would you like this one userspaced, rather than deleted? --Pi zero (talk) 19:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


Tell me about this "Course Instructor" business-----looks interesting!! --Bddpaux (talk) 23:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

JP Morgan article[edit]

It seems that I may've missed that you were already reviewing that article whenever I dropped in the UR template (I always check for one of those first). It's a nice problem for us to have reviewers stepping all over one another! That's something we can deal with. --Bddpaux (talk) 16:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I didn't see the notice at all. There was no click on because of comments on the talk page when I submitted the review. :/ --LauraHale (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Exclude in print[edit]

Was just sighting a few interwiki, and noticed Category:Exclude in print. From looking on Wikipedia, this appears 'supposed' to be what I'd expect - a mechanism to exclude certain templates from books &c. generated from wiki content. It says on the enWP page this is broken. Is that out-of-date information, replaced by another mechanism, or, ... ?

If it actually works, I'm sure there's a huge amount of templates we should exclude from print-formatting. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

New features for course pages[edit]

Several noticeable improvements to the EducationProgram extension (in addition to some small bug fixes) will go live on or around 2014-01-23:


All participants in a course (students, instructors, volunteers) will receive Notifications whenever their course talk page is edited. Thus, editors can use course talk pages to send messages they want the whole class to be aware of, and the class participants are likely to see them.

Special:Contributions student notice

For users enrolled as students in courses that are active, a notice will appear at the top of Special:Contributions noting which course(s) they are enrolled in. This will make it easy for users who come across the work of student editors to find out that they are part of a course and identify other class participants.

Adding articles

Course instructors and volunteers will be able to assign articles to student editors, instead of all articles needing to be added by the student editors themselves.

Adding students

Instructors and volunteers will be able to add users as students in courses, instead of all student editors needing to enroll for themselves. This makes it easier to maintain complete lists of students, and also makes the extension more suitable for tracking participation in edit-a-thons, workshops and other collaborative projects beyond the Wikipedia Education Program.

If you have feedback about these new features, or other questions or ideas related to course pages, please let me know! --Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Subscribe or unsubscribe from future Wikipedia Education Program technical updates.

Education Program technical update, February 2014[edit]

We've started working on "editor campaigns", a system that we expect will eventually be able to replace our current Education Program extension (and be useful for many other purposes as well). The early work with that project will focus on a system for signup up new editors for editing campaigns (such as courses, but also edit-a-thons, Wiki Loves Monuments, etc.). Because of that, progress will be slow on the current course page system. However, we have several improvements that should be available within the next few weeks.

Anyone can edit the main text of course pages

As part of the effort to make course pages behave more like regular wiki pages, we've enabled editing of course pages by anyone. Users who currently have the right to edit courses will have access to all the fields (so that they can change the start/end dates, and change the enrollment token). Users who currently cannot edit courses will be able to edit only the "page text" portion. This change should take effect on 2014-02-27.

Simplified course editing interface

We've considerably simplified the interface for editing course pages, removing the options to rename courses. Changing the title of a course would also move the course page, creating confusion and leading to a number of bugs. Several other parts of the course editing interface were not very useful, so we've removed them to make it easier on newcomers. This change should take effect on 2014-02-27.

Additional Notifications

Two students participating in the Facebook Open Academy mentorship program are currently working on additional Notifications for course pages. For the first of these, users will be notified whenever someone else adds them to a course.

Once again, if you have feedback about these new features, or other questions or ideas related to course pages, please let me know!--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Subscribe or unsubscribe from future Wikipedia Education Program technical updates.

Wikinews:Sochi Paralympic Games[edit]

Perhaps needlessly pedantic, but shouldn't this have 'Winter' in the pagename?

I note that, unlike the London games, the mainstream are - effectively - pretending there are no Paralympic Winter Games. That seems pretty disgusting, particularly considering a good number of Winter events are more high-risk than the Summer games. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

There are a number of external links point to the page, so if it moves, the redirect should remain. I put it here originally to make it different name in case of the possibility of going to the 2018 Games exists. And yeah, these games are a lot less high profile than the Summer Games. :/ The UK's prime minister has apparently announced because of the situation in Russia, he will not be attending these. On the plus side, these will be the first ever Paralympic Games in the USA with live television coverage on network television. We'll see what happens. I've just personally set my own bar lower because basically one English language reporter, and the rest of the reporting team is Ukrainian. :/ --LauraHale (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Ukrainian Paralympic Committee announces decision to compete at Games so their goal of peace will not be forgotten[edit]

Problem. The lede is too long, and the first sentence gives a highly politically charged message that isn't in the headline and isn't really clear from the notes, and I'm not at all sure is intended. But because it's OR, there's probably nothing I can do to tweak it. :-S  I'm working on figuring that out now. --Pi zero (talk) 13:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Planning to cover the Paralympics a year ago, we didn't see this situation coming, did we. --Pi zero (talk) 14:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
The problem is the message was highly political. The Russian probably cannot be helped. Does the Ukrainain interwiki link assist at all? The lede can be shortened to they will compete. Just cannot get around how political on some level. It was repeated: This is not about politics. This is about peace and human rights. repeated. The speaker said the athletes were there because if they were not, Ukrainians might send a message for a few hours, but then they would be forgotten. By being there and talking about wanting peace, they were able to do more.--LauraHale (talk) 14:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
The political-ness of the message wasn't the problem. We can report neutrally that somebody said something highly political. The difficulty had to do with the dynamics of the lede. Anyway, I set down my reasoning in the review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 15:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC)::::
Writing that lede was one of the hardest things. The guy talked for an hour, and it was the same refrain over and over to a degree. Hard to encapsulate what was said. No problems with changes. --LauraHale (talk) 15:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Norway beats Czech Republic in sledge hockey overtime win in first match at Winter Paralympics[edit]

The name of the player who scored in overtime didn't check out. I removed the name and published, as that seemed more practical approach under the circumstances. --Pi zero (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

No worries. --LauraHale (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

USA sledge hockey team beats Italy in Winter Paralympics opener[edit]

The pdf on scoop is apparently damaged, unreadable. Not sure what I'm gonna do (I figure it's a little after midnight in Sochi); for now I'm moving forward using the on-wiki notes, and plan to see where I am when I've exhausted them. --Pi zero (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Published, with the loss of the two paragraphs of direct quotes near the bottom. Review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Wheelchair curling continues at the 2014 Winter Paralympics[edit]

The first pdf, "2014-03-10 Wheelchair curling.pdf", is unreadable/damaged (attachment on "[Scan] 2014-03-10 Wheelchair curling (part 1?)"). --Pi zero (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Did second attempt to send improve things? --LauraHale (talk) 13:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm waiting for it to download now... --Pi zero (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Yesss. Got it. (What I learned from last time was to check the file(s) sooner rather than later.) --Pi zero (talk) 13:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Good good. The problem with some of these winter sports is it is hard to watch lots of people at once and write commentary on sports where I am only a little bit familiar with this. This one is not particularly great but tried longer. The Russians did the chanting thing, and talking about random stone placement in the middle of one particular end feels like talking about one particular pitch in a baseball game. :/ --LauraHale (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Adrianne Wadewitz[edit]

Sad to hear of her death. I agree it's newsworthy, but I think a few more paragraphs would go a very long way to establishing her importance.
I didn't get into verification, but glancing at your notes we'd want links to all the primary sources (such as her enWP userpage and the Facebook post) on the talk page. If the fb post isn't public, of course, we'll need a description of what it says.
An interesting point you made is she was a go-to figure for media quotes. Perhaps add that to the article ("Was often quoted by international news media on the issue") and list some examples on the talk page. Partly would help establish newsworthiness, and partly it just seems an important aspect to her story. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 12:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution about Adrianne Wadewitz's death. Is it too late to include memorial services in L.A. and Indiana? Her partner has mentioned the dates but did not give too many details. Crtew (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

It's been more than 24 hours since publication. One could add a remark on the opinions page. --Pi zero (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Laura, thank you for your article Wikimedian activist Adrianne Wadewitz dies. It's been referenced by multiple places elsewhere on the web as a helpful piece for concerned people to find more information. This is such a tragic loss to her family, friends, academia, and the Wikipedia community. Thanks again, -- Cirt (talk) 23:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Youth Olympics Games, Nanjing 2014[edit]

Having been co-opted into this project, would welcome input from your experience in Sochi, and with the London Paralympics.

Got myself a Canon EOS 400D for photos, and would be taking along a couple of mobiles for video footage. Similarly, should have enough kit to do professional-quality audio on interviews/press conferences. Getting the content/media isn't the problem - it's what you learned from London will be most-valuable to me in doing this gig in August. You know — as well as anybody — that I don't have a dramatically high regard for sports journalism; that doesn't mean I'd not try to do it to the best of my ability. Much like London, I'm going to have to define/design technical infrastructure to make life easier for the three of us there. In this case, getting that infrastructure right will probably see Wikimedia Austria (and Germany) strong-arming the WMF into replicating that for any events where contributors get accreditation.

If you'd prefer passing on where you think you (and the rest of us on Wikinews) went wrong by email, I'll keep that in-confidence. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Find the NOC media person now. Get on their media announcement list for the event. Figure out how much access you will get. Spend a lot of time doing the Wikipedia part first. Identify all the sportspeople you will be covering, and write their biographies now. Learn the rules for any sports you are unfamiliar with that you may cover. Chances are, any interviews will be short ones in a mix zone following the event, and you'll have like 1 to 4 minutes to interview people. (And they may not be willing to agree to that.) Find out the copyright policy now. WM-DE had the opportunity to go to Sochi and chose not to do it because there was no value in sending Wikipedians as WP allows no original reporting, and the images were not able to be uploaded to Commons without violating copyright. Wikinews had too little value, and the WMF told Ukrainians that those metrics did not matter. If you want WMF funding, bring down the total budget to less than €1,000 per person. This includes flights, accomodation and all other costs. Approach people who are involved with WM-HK, because you will be asked why not them. Where is the cost effectiveness in sending people from Europe? --LauraHale (talk) 12:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
WMF funding is resolved; and, as youth games, tracking down competitors is going to be far more-challenging than anything else. It's the lessons from London and Sochi I'm interested in, less than how you think I should approach this. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
I explained the lessons of Sochi and London and Copper Mountain and La Molina and the Sydney Wheelchair basketball. Who are your contacts and in what sport organizations do they belong? What sort of access are they going to facilitate? That's the biggest issue and lesson. Outside that, the next biggest lesson is Wikipedia. Get a competitor list from the organization providing you media access. Start creating articles on English and Simple English Wikipedia now. Create an article for every competitor. Start filling in the blanks for the competition on the Wikipedia articles about the competition. The biggest problem with Sochi was those two things were not done. Be able and prepared to talk informally and casually with sportspeople about their performances and things going on. Use the knowledge learned from writing the Wikipedia article to make interviewing easier. Spend as much of your free time as possible writing these articles, and supplementing it with writing news for Wikinews if you see a new story about them. --LauraHale (talk) 15:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Adrianne Wadewitz[edit]

Hello! I've translated the article on Adrianne Wadewitz's death for the italian wikinews as you asked me :-) --Nastoshka (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Education Program technical update, April 2014[edit]

Since the last update, development of the editor campaigns project has been continuing, and it's almost at the point that it will be useful to users running edit-a-thons and other non-course outreach events. (If you are planning such an event soon and would like to beta test it for tracking the contributions of newcomers, get it touch.) In the meantime, we've made a few small improvements and bug fixes to the Education Program extension:

Default course end date

The default end date for courses is now approximately six months in the future, instead of immediately. This will prevent the common problem where a user creates a new course page but does change the default dates, resulting in a course that is immediately considered "ended" and thus cannot be enrolled in.

Notifications when you get added to a course

Whenever a user gets added to a course by someone else, they will now receive a Notification.

Disabling individual student profiles

The student profile special page (Special:Student/Username, not to be confused with Special:Students) is a page that lists the courses a student editor is enrolled in, and is also supposed to list the articles that user is working on. However, the list of articles can include incorrect data in cases where an instructor or volunteer assigned the articles to the student editor. These profiles are being removed from the extension altogether. This change should go into effect Thursday, May 1. (Logs are still available to find out which courses a user is enrolled in.)

Article edit notifications for students coming soon

A nearly complete patch from Facebook Open Academy student Jeff Lloyd will add a new type of Notification: students will be alerted to edits made by others to the article(s) they are assigned (as well as the corresponding talk pages). Expect to see this feature within the next several weeks.

Duplicate courses and API deletion

Bugs in the course page creation process (now fixed) led in some cases to duplicate listings for the same course at Special:Courses. This happens when the same course page had two (or more) different course ID numbers. It is possible to clean up such duplicate entries using by making calls to the API. I've documented this process and written a Python script for it.

If you have feedback about these changes, or other questions or ideas related to course pages, please let Anna Koval or me know!--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 19:23, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Subscribe or unsubscribe from future Wikipedia Education Program technical updates.

'Debating with a woman is complicated,' says Spanish Partido Popular EU candidate[edit]

I really thought I was going to finish this review before midnight UTC, but it fell down at the tail end of verification. Found nothing in any source about abortion, leaving most of a large paragraph unverified. I didn't feel I could delete that much. So not-ready'd. --Pi zero (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

253 by my count!![edit]

This award is presented to Wikinews reporters upon their 100th published news article.

--Bddpaux (talk) 14:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Arbcom election 2014[edit]

Reminder (as you're on the current ArbCom). Nominations are open for the 2014 selection. You may nominate yourself, or I'd be pleased to nominate you. --Pi zero (talk) 21:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Being bothered by User:Pi zero[edit]

He is bothering me with rubbish each edit. He is never contributing. He deletes articles comments sites here, although the article is existing. Articles under development are clean up articles. I might not write about RB Leipzig. My started articles have interest and he says that other archived articles are which from amateur clubs, university clubs or something else. He wants to rename my name here and is not rename me. My articles are written after the style such as about other proven football match reports. He is psychic unable to name reasons. Please remove him from the board! He neither productive nor socially competent or educated, for a globally representative on public free sites. --Nikebrand (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Typing error?[edit]

In the article ONCE defeats Getafe 86-36 in Spain's top level wheelchair basketball league it reads "Bzrcelona native Jaume Llambi". I believe it is Barcelona... Can you correct it or manage somehow to do so? The article is locked - and seeing such a typing error in a featured article is rather weird. Thanks. --Okino (talk) 11:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Okino. The usual way to handle this sort of thing is to put an {{editprotected}} request on the article's collaboration page (aka talk page). I'll take a look. --Pi zero (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Done --Pi zero (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


Busy elsewhere? We understand, but this is a notice of privilege expiry!

Note! Your privileges on English Wikinews have been reduced.

Under the Privilege expiry policy (enacted October 13, 2012) the rights held by your user account have been reduced due to inactivity, or lack of privilege use. You can view your user rights log here.
Point 4 of the Privilege expiry policy provides for fast-tracking reacquisition of privileges. We all understand that real-life commitments can severely curtail the level of commitment you can give to Wikinews; the privilege reduction is in no way intended as a reflection on your past work, or to imply you are unwelcome. The aim in curtailing privileges is to address security risks, and concern that a long period of inactivity means you may not be up-to-date with current policy and practices.

--Pi zero (talk) 00:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Vietnam's Cong Le Van wins gold in men's -49kg powerlifting at Rio Paralympics[edit]

FYI, not sure I'll get to this tonight; I've been rather sick for the past couple of days and am nonetheless in the midst of a rather lengthy review. --Pi zero (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


Any thoughts on Vietnamese naming conventions? (One thing that continues to impress me, as a takeaway lesson from your time here, is how hugely the efficiency of the review process can be affected by bandwidth of reporter-reviewer communication; back in the day, before... whatever it was that happened happened, Vietnamese naming conventions would have been the subject of a quick consult on IRC and we'd have figured out what we were going to do and moved forward with confidence in short order.) --Pi zero (talk) 14:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)