User talk:MyName/Archive

Message for MessedRocker to relay to Cspurrier

Cspurrier, I would appricate if you could give a reason you blocked the IP I use for one week. Thanks MyName 23:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The IP was being used to impersonate other users. Please contact your isp about the abuse being conducted with this ip to prevent future blocks.--Cspurrier 00:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Notice

I am the owner of Vandal's Laywer. MyName 22:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Alright. It's a very noble cause to assist people who have been blocked, however I'll have to ask you to do it under your own account. —this is messedr͏̈ocker (talk) 22:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Okay then, I put notices on my pages. Thanks. MyName 22:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Hay, Anybody know how long autoblocks last on Wikinews? MyName 23:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to my talk

Hi there. Happy editing. Bawolff ☺☻ 23:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

thanks MyName 23:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Editing Starts Tomorrow

Probally won't get around to doing any editing tonight (finals exams) tomorrow I will start though. MyName 23:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Password

Would you be kind enough to send the password to User:RadioKirk to my e-mail address? Thank you. RadioKirk2 03:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, Rappy. Took me long enough, didn't it?

You know, as Wikipedia aspires to build "the sum of all human knowledge", it's understandable that people from different regions of the world with different opinions and different culures would differ, sometimes violently, as to what is acceptable and what is not within the encyclopedia. The ones who treat it as a game escape me; surely there are things more fun than spray-painting the walls, so to speak. You've said being productive is for sometime in the future; why? RadioKirk talk to me 05:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

RadioKirk, the future is now. MyName 16:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm glad to hear it; though it's frankly tough to believe, given your history at WP and your creation of an impostor account here—and particularly since you were caught impersonating me in IRC. Please do not forget that your "'forced' vacation" from WP was something you forced us to do; nevertheless, I do hope you have seen that vandalization is not fun—especially for those of us who clean it up (admins are janitors, don't forget)—and that helping to build the encyclopedia is far, far more rewarding. I can tell you it pleases me no end to have created two featured articles and all but recreated the third. RadioKirk talk to me 17:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I, too, hope you'll prove it to me. I do have an additional question, though: Shall I request a CheckUser or are you also User:Nanook? RadioKirk talk to me 17:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

No need. You may request to have the account deleted as it is (regrettably on my part) me. MyName 17:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Alright. RadioKirk talk to me 18:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

So Nanook is MyName as well (I had a sneking suspicion of that). Bawolff ☺☻ 00:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Develop

yes there is a list. wikinews:Workspace, template:developing stories as well as a list on the lower right of the main page. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem.

—THIS IS MESSEDOCKER (TALK) 01:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: First article

Looks good. As it turns out, I write news for a living, though radio news and print news are completely different animals. Still, I believe I've removed the POV from Iraqi police, witness: US troops kill pregnant Iraqi woman in car entering "no-go" zone. :) RadioKirk talk to me 02:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks.

Per my understanding, there is more than one RadioKirk and, as far as I know, none of us is notable. Any such article would be speedied. :) RadioKirk talk to me 02:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Not bad...

...with the Air Marshal one... 68.39.174.238 02:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

HeHe, we need more of those... mind if I ask who you were on WpA? If you're trying to complete restart, don't answer (It's not really my buissiness anyway!). Thanx again. 68.39.174.238 03:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't recognize either, which is I guess a good thing. Hope I see more news from you ;D! 68.39.174.238 03:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Q

Replied. RadioKirk talk to me 03:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

12 arrested in Canadian counter-terrorism operation

well, at a first look I wouldnt include the names as they are only suspected, brb international 16:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC) But exept that, if you remove the names, I think its ok. If all is correct I guess a lot of suffering has been prevented. international 16:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

As I said they are suspected. Remember that you are responsible for naming them. If they found unguilty you are in trouble naming them. Usually naming in news is after somone found guilty in court. international 16:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikifying or to make wikilinks. Find words in article that hav Wikipediareferences and use this code:

Canadian

Look at it in 'editmode' and see that first word (here Canada) is the title to Wikipedia article. The second (here Canadian) is the word seen with its hyperlink international 16:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Guess this was your second publishing of by yourself mostly edited article. Congratulations and welcome Wikinewsie :D international 16:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:Request for Review.

It looks ready for publishing and is a nicely written article too. You might want to add links to Wikipedia by using the template shown in the bottom of the edit window, where possible. If you can find any related stories, include those too. I think you were right in revealing the names of those arrested since you have not implied that they are guilty. Thanks for your contribution and you need any more help please don't hesitate to ask. PVJ (Talk) 16:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Spelling correct

Just to note, your "spelling correction" here was not necessarily needed; "litres" is a perfectly acceptable spelling. However, I've decided to not revert, since you did other things, too. —THIS IS MESSEDOCKER (TALK) 18:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

RE: Hi

Hi yourself and welcome to the wikinews club LOL - Cartman02au (Talk)(AU Portal) 00:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

New Gender Gap

I Removed this.

by the year 2020 women will own more then 95% of wealth in United States.

Put this in.

401(k)s value used to be in balance between man and Women but in only 10 years there has been a 32% increase in the value womens 401(k)s to 2/3 [1] if this trend continues for the next 10 years women will have 87% of the balance.

I hope this is now OK with you Free them 12:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

hello

Can the tag "Notnews" please be removed from New Gender Gap Free them 13:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks for the welcome. Pandoo 19:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey buddy

When you get unblocked; stay unblocked. The project needs you. I put in a request with CSpurrier; we'll see. Neutralizer 14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouragement. I'm glad to see you're unblocked now also. I joined after you had already been blocked for a month or so, and I don’t really know the reason why, but you seem like a strong Wikinewsie. :-D MyName 01:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Question

Any particular reason you're vandalising your own user page and distorting other people's votes on your RfA? --Deprifry|+T+ 18:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

It seems as if my password was compromised. I changed it now! We are having the same problem on Wikipedia. You can contact RadioKirk about it. MyName 21:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

P.S. can you revert my Userpage because I'm blocked form editing. Thanks. MyName 21:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)