User talk:Renamed user g1luxev6mk

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Huge explosions in Tianjin, China[edit]

Hi. You made changes to Huge explosions in Tianjin, China. Your edit summary said it was formatting improvements, but you changed facts, as well. Do you know if the sources (as listed) support your claimed facts? I am --SVTCobra 02:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Published. History of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leugen[edit]

You are very active here and even publishing lots of articles, congratulations. I tried to write about the very few interesting events here around. The reactions on the community did not feel too good. Someone hurt virtually all Wikimedia guide lines addressing me and made several predictions my articles wouldn't be reviewed anymore. This fulfilled even to the following articles. But that might be past.

When searching for a reviewer I was not lucky. Finally I found this Wikinews is a pretty small group. Are there any plans how to develop in the future?--Lib2know (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar[edit]

I, 14.139.242.195 (talk) (the IP of acagastya) award you the team barnstar for the tireless contribution to keep Wikinews updated!
14.139.242.195 (talk) 02:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest to make more catchy and strong lede. The news, is not clear to an Indian college boy, if he is a Wikinews editor. When I was new to this project, I read this thing on User:Bddpaux's page.
Absolutely free advice for any new writers here:

  • Within the first 3 sentences of any article you're writing, ask yourself, "Would a school teacher in Manila care about this? What about a waiter in Sydney or a young mother in Hong Kong?" The answer should be a quick 'Yes', or you might be wasting your time here: this is an international news site.
  • I live by this about articles/submissions here: Get it, write it, submit it, move on. You'll be helping yourself if you adopt that motto too.

My intention is not to demotivate you, I am really sorry if you feel so, but this article is not providing much information. Let's work together and have a better lede.
14.139.242.195 (talk) 09:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some choice quotes:
  • From WN:Newsworthiness: "Wikinews is global in reach but potentially local in coverage".
  • From WN:Pillars of Wikinews writing: "Relevance should be to more than a few hundred people, which doesn't preclude local news." "The lede should show the focus is newsworthy."
I think that last point is key for the lede: our lede should help the young mother in Hong Kong to see what there is in the story that may be of interest to her, allowing her to judge accurately whether they wish to read more. --Pi zero (talk) 12:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But, this is not that every teacher in Manila should actually care. What if I write about football and the teacher is not interested in sports? It used to disturb me a lot in the beginning days. But, that statement meant that it should appeal to a significant number of people.
14.139.242.195 (talk) 13:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Even in Edmonton, not all readers will care equally about a given story. It should be clear why they might care, though, so that if they choose not to read on it's because they've made an informed decision not to. And it can sometimes be interesting to read about local goings on in distant parts of the world, if presented lucidly enough. --Pi zero (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just an advice[edit]

Instead of creating various pages, why not make like this:
Candidate A elected as Prime Minister of Canada
Candidate A, leader of the Party name, has become the Prime Minister of Canada after the last polling stations in British Columbia and Yukon closed at TIME...Or you can read it on my sandbox.
Copy - paste - edit them in main space once it is news
14.139.242.195 (talk) 01:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Published. See review comments, history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on this article. I was hoping to make this my return article but work sadly got in the way again. I'm happy to see someone go on and create it.

Thanks :) Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Published. Detailed history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Published. See history of edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 16:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Seeing you after so many days. You were on a wikibreak? I just wanted to say that this article, you asked to be reviewed, is just smaller that the minimal length. A reviewer might point out this thing. Further, you can ask a reviewer in the freenode web chat for instant comments.
(It is u:acagastya)
116.119.128.96 (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Argh. I hit a couple of snags here, one of which was major alterations to a source since submission (which, in this case, appears to include the mainstream news media echoing the Iraqi government's storyline; I really wish I'd been able to do a review just after it was submitted). Review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 17:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice start on that. The next problem after cut 'n' paste of a couple of articles to make a Wikinews one is when people start with that, and scuff it up a bit; meaning change a wording here and there, reorder the details, and such. Starting like that, even if the article is so redone as to get past review, is still 'technically' plagiarism.

I've always advocated reading sources, deciding on how you want to present the information, then writing whilst referring to the sources to check you've got facts/quotes spot-on. What can be a real nuisance there is having three or four advert-laden source articles open in multiple tabs.

Of course, all contributors have ended up figuring out how to write for the project in their own way. What works for one person might not work for anyone else.

Maybe it'd be worthwhile expanding the essay onto other common issues. --Brian McNeil / talk 10:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was exactly what I wanted to add right after that.
Plagiary is also of course an ethical problem, and journalists can get into deep trouble over it regardless of whether it's illegal (and imo they should get into more trouble over it than they do). I recall listening, not so long ago, to the fuss over Fareed Zakaria and thinking, if he'd learned non-plagiary on en.wn synthesis articles he wouldn't be having this trouble. --Pi zero (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The synthesis-writing technique you describe (with the short notes) seems potentially liable to slipping on details here and there, which I do observe a bit of in articles. As a contrasting technique, here's what I've tended to do when writing synthesis: I write a set of private notes on my laptop (not on-wiki), in which as I study the sources I set up sections for different aspects of the story, and write into each section the relevant passages quoted from the sources, sometimes quoting as much as a couple of paragraphs from a source (if it's too much, I should arrange my sections around smaller aspects); since it's just a private copy, there's no problem with copyright at that point. Then I look at what I've got, decide on an organization for my article, and when writing about each aspect I have all the relevant source passages right there and can work out what I want to say and say it entirely differently than any of the sources. Usually it's not difficult for me to avoid particulars of the way the sources say things because I'm choosing each thing to say from a thorough mixing of the sources, not trying to rephrase something from any one particular source. At any rate, it's worked for me — though admittedly it's not a small operation. --Pi zero (talk) 00:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, today didn't work out well for me wiki-wise, and I didn't get to this article until late enough that I felt it really needs more updating than I could give it within my purview as reviewer (it was a difficult and uncomfortable call, especially since I felt bad I hadn't gotten to it sooner). --Pi zero (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Quake' article[edit]

I love short, tight little articles like that one.....good work!! --Bddpaux (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is long overdue!![edit]


The Order of the Modest Pencil


For completing 5 edits.

Great work! Keep it up! --Bddpaux (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hello, Leugen9001. It has been a long time I didn't see your name in the recent changes. Hoping for a comeback?
acagastya 11:10, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was banned (for good reason) on Wikipedia for vandalism, among other things. I'm not banned on Wikinews, so I am still allowed to contribute, but I've got to be cautious to avoid breaking ban avoidance rules. --Leugen9001 (talk) 23:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back :-) Gryllida (talk) 04:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Found some problems, some of which would have applied if I'd gotten to it late yesterday. Review comments; edits during review. --Pi zero (talk) 18:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]