User talk:ULCM Corres

Welcome to Wikinews

Getting started as a contributor How to write an article Pick something current? Use two independent sources? Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask? Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template. [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems. Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation   Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.

All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours. Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies Neutral point of view Cite sources Writing an article Content guide Style guide Reviewing articles

Places to go, people to meet Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved The Water Cooler The Latest News The Newsroom Articles for deletion Audio Wikinews Recent Changes

Write your first article for Wikinews! Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it! It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikinews due to WN:ROLE. If you believe this block is unjustified or wish to contest it, you may add {{unblock|your reason}} to this page, go to Wikinews IRC to request to be unblocked, or send a message to wikinews-l wikimedia ● org.

(info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves)

Unblock request

{{unblock|Block First, was without warning against new user not familiar with what appears to be an obscure policy (Issues regarding user name should rightfully be discussed, or at least linked with a prominent link, on the Signup page, to alert new users.) Further No warning was ever given, which tends to suggest that the blocking account has a personal issue that needs to be left off the site and taken up elsewhere. also, no request to change the user name, which I currently still extending an offer to do, would have been the most appropriate and reasonable means of dealing with this type of situation, as opposed to blocking an account permanently without warning. This also blocks by IP, which means the problem cant even be fixed to address the blocking Administrator's allegation.) Note that the The blocking account is also highly suspect of retaliatory conduct in relationship to other sites, which is under current formal investigation to determine if this is in fact the case, at which point I will request that administrator privileges for the account be revoked, if I receive information that suggests Administrator privileges are being abused in any way. Further, It must be understood that "ULCM" is NOT an organization, it is a TITLE which means "Univesral Life Church Minister", in common collective use by ministers ordained by the ULC (Universal Life Church) at Modesto, CA. As such, a title does not imply a "role" account, any more than other generic TITLES (i.e. "Reverend", "Officer", Senator, Doctor, etc.) imply a "role" account, per policy. The blocking account probably confused "ULCM" as a personal title with "ULC" which is the organization to which the title belongs. Wherefore, it is requested that the block be lifted, to change the account name to appease the blocking Administrator if possible. ULCM Corres (talk) 19:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)}}

• If the request to unblock had simply said I was mistaken about it being a role account, I'd already have unblocked it with an apology. Before taking action, though, I'll need to think about the implications of a user who immediately threatens legal action (violating WN:NOT) and accuses of retaliation for something — what it'd be retaliation for, I'm having trouble imagining, but it makes me wonder if somehow or other sockpuppetry could be involved. --Pi zero (talk) 21:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Further complicating the situation is a second account now in use obviously by the same person. That's allowed, but two unblocked accounts for the same user is something we're very leery of. The two most natural alternatives would seem to be

• block one of the two and use the other; or,
• unblock both and have one of the accounts label the other as a {{doppelganger}}.

There's a bit of a quibble about the second option since the template does say established user, and the user in question really isn't established at this point, but imho this distinction is the least of our problems atm.

Does the user have a preference between these two options, and in either case, which account is to be the primary? --Pi zero (talk) 12:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)