Talk:Albert Pujols ends his worst homerun drought

Review of revision 1492659 [Not ready]

Revision 1492659 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This is well below minimal length for a standalone article. We generally want at least three medium-sized paragraphs. A dateline (like, "Anaheim, California, United States – ") indicates where the reporter is reporting from. Are you reporting from Anaheim (and is there some reason why that matters)? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1492659 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This is well below minimal length for a standalone article. We generally want at least three medium-sized paragraphs. A dateline (like, "Anaheim, California, United States – ") indicates where the reporter is reporting from. Are you reporting from Anaheim (and is there some reason why that matters)? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1493223 [Not ready]

Revision 1493223 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Articles require a minimum of two independent, trustowrthy sources. Although this is an improvement on the other baseball article in that there are different authors here (one wire report, one written in-house), at the end of the day the only source here is still ESPN. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I'd probably have bitten the bullet and let this through on length. However, if one-two sentences could be added, that would be good. Assuming no drastic problems appear during an intense review, all this really needs are incorporating an extra source and maybe adding a sentence or two of info from it. Otherwise, this is close to being ready. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1493223 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Articles require a minimum of two independent, trustowrthy sources. Although this is an improvement on the other baseball article in that there are different authors here (one wire report, one written in-house), at the end of the day the only source here is still ESPN. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I'd probably have bitten the bullet and let this through on length. However, if one-two sentences could be added, that would be good. Assuming no drastic problems appear during an intense review, all this really needs are incorporating an extra source and maybe adding a sentence or two of info from it. Otherwise, this is close to being ready. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1493376 [Passed]

Revision 1493376 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1493376 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.