Talk:Could an unmarked grave in Winchester contain the remains of King Alfred?

Waiting for more info back and possibly a two-tier interview on the subject with him and Winchester University lecturer. --Computron (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

E-mails with scripts sent to "scoop". --Computron (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Lede

The lede doesn't say when the remains were exhumed (the date). Why exactly were they were exhumed recently - who, when, why, and how hypothesised that it's King Alfred there? Gryllida 12:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Current lede is rather better; could you please also look into why they did this on March 26, and not earlier or later? Thanks. Gryllida 14:19, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1867197 [Not ready]

Revision 1867197 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I have gone through every scoop e-mail for this interview and I cannot verify where this line comes from: "By order of the Chancellor, if no further procedure is granted, the bones would be re-interred within 6 months maximum." If line is in here, I cannot find it in the e-mails to scoopñ Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1867197 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I have gone through every scoop e-mail for this interview and I cannot verify where this line comes from: "By order of the Chancellor, if no further procedure is granted, the bones would be re-interred within 6 months maximum." If line is in here, I cannot find it in the e-mails to scoopñ Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Sent an e-mail to "scoop" with that information now, forgot to forward initially, apologies. --Computron (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1868744 [Passed]

Revision 1868744 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1868744 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.