As usual with short articles, there are some pretty interesting details not covered (I note the fears, rather emphasized by AJE, that the conviction may be easy to overturn on appeal because the prosecution was poorly done). As common with short articles, one has to stop and wonder whether interesting omitted details constitute non-neutrality. Often they do not, though; a short article omits things or it wouldn't be short, and the question is whether the things included were a reasonable choice given the intended brevity.
There was one passage too close to source (extensive structure notably unchanged); as a pointedly limited measure to redress the problem, I moved a clause from end to middle of the passage.
I did wonder about the 'found not guilty' characterization of a verdict that apparently consisted of finding the crimes were outside the statute of limitations; but even AJE also described it as an "acquittal".
It would have been nice, of course, had we managed to get this out sooner; but it does mean we have it for the archives, and can therefore draw on it in future as an easy source of material already compatibly licensed.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
As usual with short articles, there are some pretty interesting details not covered (I note the fears, rather emphasized by AJE, that the conviction may be easy to overturn on appeal because the prosecution was poorly done). As common with short articles, one has to stop and wonder whether interesting omitted details constitute non-neutrality. Often they do not, though; a short article omits things or it wouldn't be short, and the question is whether the things included were a reasonable choice given the intended brevity.
There was one passage too close to source (extensive structure notably unchanged); as a pointedly limited measure to redress the problem, I moved a clause from end to middle of the passage.
I did wonder about the 'found not guilty' characterization of a verdict that apparently consisted of finding the crimes were outside the statute of limitations; but even AJE also described it as an "acquittal".
It would have been nice, of course, had we managed to get this out sooner; but it does mean we have it for the archives, and can therefore draw on it in future as an easy source of material already compatibly licensed.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
This article appears to be related to protests that took place in 2011, even though the focal news event took place in 2012. So, even if we do break things down by protest year, presumably this would stay in the 2011 category. --Pi zero (talk) 01:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
