Talk:Poverty rises as food prices increase

This isn't the oldest article in the queue, but I'm going to review it now due to the vandalization issue. Gopher65_talk 00:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1215529 [Passed]

Revision 1215529 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This article is a bit too close the the telegraph article for comfort. I changed a bit of phrasing to uncopyvio it a bit. That said, looking at the rest of the sources, it looks like every article out there uses fairly similar phrasing, for whatever reason. So maybe some of the "sameness" of this article to the sources is hard to avoid, just because there are a limited set of words and phrases in existence that accurately describe the situation in question (increasing poverty as a result of food price increases). Gopher65talk 00:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1215529 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This article is a bit too close the the telegraph article for comfort. I changed a bit of phrasing to uncopyvio it a bit. That said, looking at the rest of the sources, it looks like every article out there uses fairly similar phrasing, for whatever reason. So maybe some of the "sameness" of this article to the sources is hard to avoid, just because there are a limited set of words and phrases in existence that accurately describe the situation in question (increasing poverty as a result of food price increases). Gopher65talk 00:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.