Talk:Seismologist Mario Pardo rebukes notion that Pichilemu, Chile experiencing "seismic swarm"

Review of revision 978812 [Failed]

Revision 978812 of this article has been reviewed by PSD27 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: No English sources. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Although this article seems fine, I cannot properly verify its content since all the sources are in Spanish. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 978812 of this article has been reviewed by PSD27 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: No English sources. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Although this article seems fine, I cannot properly verify its content since all the sources are in Spanish. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 978984 [Failed]

Revision 978984 of this article has been reviewed by Pmlineditor (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Same reason why it was failed earlier. I doubt we have many users who are es-4/es-N out here. Try to use English sources. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Good work with the article, but sorry, it's unlikely it can be passed if it only uses Spanish sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 978984 of this article has been reviewed by Pmlineditor (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Same reason why it was failed earlier. I doubt we have many users who are es-4/es-N out here. Try to use English sources. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Good work with the article, but sorry, it's unlikely it can be passed if it only uses Spanish sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Scratch that, see this. I hope someone comes along and reviews it. Pmlineditor ^discuss 10:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 979629 [Passed]

Revision 979629 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good article:). There were a few problems with the translations, but don't worry, that's normally with inter-lingual reporting. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 979629 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good article:). There were a few problems with the translations, but don't worry, that's normally with inter-lingual reporting. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Edit request

{{editprotected}}

Please add Category:Lolol --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 17:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Please add Category:2010 Pichilemu earthquake and Category:O'Higgins Region too. --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 19:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Done Benny the mascot (talk) 18:29, 26 May 2010 (UTC)