Other than direct quotes, source passages copied and "scuffed up" are copyvio. In a number of cases I turned close-copied passages with small embedded direct quotes into full direct quotes. See WN:PILLARS#own.
The political aspect of this story, revolving apparently around the Trinamool Congress and its opposition, is interesting and would have been good to explore. From studying the sources, the reference to "goons from a reputed political party" is evidently intended to refer to them, but this doesn't come through clearly in the synthesis. I considered whether there was anything I could do, without my purview as reviewer, to clarify this point, but a bracketed identification of the party within the quote would be analysis, and an added sentence at the end of that paragraph about student allegations regarding Trinamool Congress would be substantial addition of material. I did think about changing the order of sentences in the following paragraph, by moving the police denial down two sentences, so that the quote about goons from a reputed political party is followed immediately by the sentence about Trinamool Congress, but it seemed rather pushy to not put the police response first.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
Other than direct quotes, source passages copied and "scuffed up" are copyvio. In a number of cases I turned close-copied passages with small embedded direct quotes into full direct quotes. See WN:PILLARS#own.
The political aspect of this story, revolving apparently around the Trinamool Congress and its opposition, is interesting and would have been good to explore. From studying the sources, the reference to "goons from a reputed political party" is evidently intended to refer to them, but this doesn't come through clearly in the synthesis. I considered whether there was anything I could do, without my purview as reviewer, to clarify this point, but a bracketed identification of the party within the quote would be analysis, and an added sentence at the end of that paragraph about student allegations regarding Trinamool Congress would be substantial addition of material. I did think about changing the order of sentences in the following paragraph, by moving the police denial down two sentences, so that the quote about goons from a reputed political party is followed immediately by the sentence about Trinamool Congress, but it seemed rather pushy to not put the police response first.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
