Comments:14 killed by bushfires in Australia
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
25 dead acctualy..—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.160.97.158 (talk • contribs)
76 now and and anticipated to rise to over 100. Wikinews is a joke since the introduction of the approval system as there is no way the articles can be up-to-date. 220.233.191.2 10:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- This was factually accurate at the time of publication. Like other news sources, such as the BBC, a new article should be written with the updated details. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
This could be improved since there is not enough articles. Having said this, that Wikinews is not BBC (LOL), this is really umbelieveble: i cannot understand, over 100 killed. It's horrible. How can be so bad?--Erik455 (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
bushfires in australia
[edit]i realise its hard to keep with international events that are happening all over at once. however the fires in australias have confirmed 181 dead and an estimate of up to 300 with 1,100 homes gopne. the only other event of such proportions was in the US in the 1800's where 1500 to 2500 died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.223.80 (talk) 08:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)