Comments:2007 Darwin Award winners announced

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

Is it just me?

Seems to me that the 2007 submissions are all pretty lame. And doesn't the "Support Group" situation violate the Darwin Award criteria of the main character not injuring others? 151.213.183.250 07:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Darwin Awards: The one thing one shouldn't be proud of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.10.35.102 (talk) 22:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)