Comments:Airplane crashes at Schiphol Airport; 9 killed

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

None of the interviewed aboard mentions engine problems while landing. Seems to me engines then worked as usual. the wiki article however doubts that. Interested what will come out. Bird strike or a typical 737(they crash more then any other) accident. 18:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Stop speculating[edit]

The crash may be vertical windshear too, don't speculate before knowing factors please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Thats a strange comment. Since i actually point to facts to make a point. And what i am doing is actually against speculations going on (engine problems, engine fall-offs even) , it is not farfetched to have the opinion something was the result of a technical problem, that is a most common interpretation of events like this early on allways.(not unique to me either) Seems to me you have an interest in the industry there then. Also. where there were no birds involved, apparently now it is shown it was indeed a technicallity of this 737 that was the main cause. 18:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC) ..