Comments:Australian drug regulator requires warning on Zolpidem
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
"The criticism was a "largely Australian-specific phenomenon and in our view does not accurately reflect [its] safety profile", she [a spokeswoman for Sanofi-Aventis] said."
Yeah sure "A largely Australian-specific phenomenon" was that the best excuse she could come up with. I guess Australians have such a completely different genetic structure than the British or the Americans 
. The side effect profile of this drug (known as Ambien in the United States) is world famous. I applaud the Australian drug regulators for making an independent decision and not buying into Big-Pharma propaganda.--Jóhann Heiðar Árnason - (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments from feedback form - "What are we going to do about ..."[edit]
What are we going to do about it?????? I know many people who are addicted to this drug and guess what leading psychiatrists in the Netherlands (AMC) and (MENTRUM) prescribe this drug. In Portugal one can buy it over the counter without doctor´s prescription? —85.243.164.174 (talk) 21:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)