Comments:Bomb threat delayed an Air France flight to Paris days before Flight 447 crashed
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
I have the feeling that the terrorist option is being suppressed by the media.
___84.228.111.232 (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Wow[edit]
They better find that voice recorder
No terrorism stuff![edit]
No terrorism!!! no bomb, just bad luck: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fm-bdtaEaFs&feature=fvhl
I wrote a new article! I hope it pass the revision!
--Hedleypanama (talk) 11:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Going to need more than a link to a YouTube video and a single AP report. And unless the AP has examined a piece or wreckage or found the black boxes, then they are in no position to dismiss anything. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 11:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Lockerbie could have been like this[edit]
What came to mind immediately I heard this was that the original bomb plot to down the Pan Am flight was timed that the bomb would explode mid-Atlantic so no evidence would ever be found.