Comments:British Airways flight lands short of runway at London Heathrow Airport

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

I think this accident happened by pilot error

BBC News 24 are now [15:35] reporting that the plane had lost all power, so pilot error seems unlikely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of fire? Is there any evidence of fire, I would expect so with the damage to the engines after a belly flop like that and wings torn off. Need to find eye witness accounts from people on board. If there was no fire, or spilt Aviation fuel then it could simply have run completely out of fuel on its final approach. That would be human error --Zven 18:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For fuel, the aircraft systems would have given warning long enough before fuel ran out. So probably not likely to be out of fuel. From what I have read and seen there is no information about fire, however it is hard to be sure from the outside pictures. Maybe the aircraft hit a flock of birds? However we won't *know* until the crash investigation releases their report. -- 20:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, systems give warning, however errors can occur. There are many real life instances of Fuel starvation. I am not saying that this happened, only interested if it could be a cause. --Zven 00:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at that images coming through, believe me, if there was fire we would know. It would be unmissably damaged by it. I've some degree of knowledge on this section of aviation (I won't pretend to be an expert) and I must say, pending more information I'm with Zven on this one: a possible case of fuel starvation. These often - but not nescescarily - have a pilot error factor to them, but it is mainly due to another problem - often a maintenance issue, sometimes a design flaw. I wonder what the service records say for the pst few months? Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 07:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse Thrust[edit]

Reading different sources, there are many eyewitness reports that the engine noise actually increased, contrary to reports of loss of power and avionics. Also, with its fly-by-wire technology, without power and avionics: how on earth would the pilot have any control of the aircraft.

Perhaps reverse thrust was activated, which would cause an increase of noise, and a huge loss of speed. — 23:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]