Comments:California Supreme Court defers ruling on same-sex marriage ban
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Sounds promising. I should read these more often, I thought this error was resolved some time back... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.38.3.180 (talk • contribs)
- error, is what you say when you misspell a word, not when people are being opressed. i understand 'a neutral point of view' and all. that still does not give you the right to give offense to people who feel their right were taken away. i will be more then glad to discuss with you, my email is lockethesecond@yahoo.com.--weirdjrc (talk) 16:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
No on prop 8
[edit]It's a goddamn shame that we have come to a point where california, home of San Francisco, practically the birthplace of the Gay Liberation Movement, not to mention the home of Haight and Asbury, has outlawed the people's fundamental right to marry whoever they please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.19.207 (talk) 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Well
[edit]The way i see it if they want to outlaw gay marraige then atleast give them civil union right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weirdjrc (talk • contribs) 15:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)