Comments:Charles Manson releases album under free license
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Why did he use the 2.0 licenses not 3.0 --Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) (Note I have no link with the organization anonymous) 20:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Cool. I always did like Manson, for some reason. Stormchaser - (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't like the man himself, but I like to use him to argue against parent groups who advocate banning various [video games|movies|TV shows|music] every time there's a school shooting or something - "You're right! Counter-Strike turned that kid into a killer, so we should ban it! And then we can ban the White Album!" A bit of a straw man maybe, but I like it. Chris Mann (Say hi!|Stalk me!) 03:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Headline text[edit]
LINDSAY LOHAN WILL MAKE THE MOVIE "MANSON GIRLS" A BAD MOVIE. I THINK THAT THEY SHOULD PICK OTHER CHARACTERS NOT SOME STUPID GIRLS THAT DON'T KNOW HOW TO ACT.IF THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE THE MOVIE THEY BETTER PUT ALOT OF EFFORT INTO BECAUSE THAT WILL PISS PEOPLE OFF.
It is NOT under free, Creative Commons license. How do I know? I mastered the album. My name is on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.166.237.114 (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)