Starting the article with "controversial" is a big problem for me. It sounds like its from a typical newspaper or news show which are clearly(and sadly) not neutral. It seems very backwards to have the controversy as the focal point of an historical event for a website that would do well to stay credible and encyclopedic. Otherwise, it will be taken off my bookmarks bar soon.
Comments:Controversial wind farm approved by US government
About this board
Not editable
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Previous page history was archived for backup purposes at Comments:Controversial wind farm approved by US government/LQT Archive 1 on 2025-11-07.
There are no older topics