Comments:Demolition to resume at New York skyscraper damaged by 9/11 after deadly fire
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Now with even more preservatives, to promote indigestion
"130 Liberty Street was originally intended to be gone by 2005, but the deadline was expanded to 2008. The fire means the work has been delayed a year with a revised estimated time of completion being 2009."
Over 6 years!?!? Where is this "Freedom Tower" we used to hear so much about?
Is this nation so fond of its scars that it will do all it can to preserve them? (QUINTIX - (talk) 21:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)) (Now, for a flame war over "asbestos" and how the two towers would of stood up longer if that where used for fire protection in addition to/instead of the existing fireproofing.)
What really throws me is the idea that US work safety laws require you to add fire containment gear to a building just so you can strip it all off again and demolish it! A better idea would simply be decontamination barriers that opened up; firefighters could have just walked through then. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 06:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)