Comments:EPA proposes using Clean Air Act to fight global warming

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to: navigation, search

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


I guess it's pretty clear now that the EPA has lost their minds, or have no idea how the environment works... or they just don't care at all. Carbon Dioxide should not be classified as a pollutant. Humans and animals exhale it as part of their natural biorythyms, plants and algae convert it back into oxygen necessary for animal life. This whole global warming thing worries me. Not the fear of destroying our world's ecology -- no, nature has found ways around extremes to ensure life continues, even if it won't be human life. My fear is of the government abusing its powers and using global warming as a tool to knock out people who they don't like. Someone giving the government a hard time? Sic the mindless eco-friendly zombies on them. An industry doesn't want to play ball and let the government buy them out? Call them on their producing of 'pollutants' and the like. This whole thing just reeks of... god, it's just awful. --98.110.200.96 20:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

CATO Global Science Report: 0.02°C Temperature Rise would be averted by new EPA rules[edit]

0.02°C Temperature Rise Averted: The Vital Number Missing from the EPA’s “By the Numbers” Fact Sheet, June 11, 2014.

An interesting analysis of the proposed new CO2 regulations for US power plants. Their methodology appears sound. Worth a look for the charts. --Tillman (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

EPA is Overstepping their Bounds![edit]

The EPA regulations against wood burning stoves are harming many small business in the United States. It will cut sales drastically because many of their former products will only be available for commercial use in the future. They can also be sold exclusively to burn coal.

Sources: http://heatmasterss.com http://heatmasterwoodboilers.webs.com https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outdoor_wood-fired_boiler

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.248.23.120 (talkcontribs) 20:20, 10 December 2015