Comments:Edmund White on writing, incest, life and Larry Kramer
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
EW seems to me a very odd guy. Isn´t he? Jaime Saldarriaga 16:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Does he really think that doctors invent something about different kinds of HIV to scare him to practice safe sex? That's just downright sad... typical, but sad... --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 22:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was disappointed in that response as well. --David Shankbone 22:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
David, another great interview.
I hope Edmund White is right about the canon taking an academic role secondary to contemporary authors. It’s not been my experience with my students, but I hope. In college courses, there are a few contemporary writers, but the emphasis is on canonical works. I just logged off the Princeton University course catalogue, which bears me out. Hampshire College was better of course, and the change is inevitable--the internet, the public domain--and it may well be that Edmund White is looking at a more forward thinking, or progressive, group of professors/teachers. MFA programs are further along than PHD programs, which are further along than undergraduate, in my estimation.
I would love to hear what title, if any, Edmund White would strike from the "classics."
Many thanks to Edmund and David for their conversation,
he is against the canon, which he views as elitist.
Comments from feedback form - "I loved this. I find his writ..."
I loved this. I find his writing incredible. I also wish it wasn't all about gay this and gay that though. It's tough. Tough to digest. I don't know if it's because maybe secretly I agree with all the sexual "activity." Or maybe it's that I'm straight and I'm not allowed to and have been programmed to not agree. I don't know. It teeters on disgusting and interesting. —22.214.171.124 (talk) 04:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments from feedback form - "i haven't laughed this hard in..."
Just another blathering commentator ...
Edmund White's comments seem to have hit a real point, at least with this reader, who is familiar with his work from his first collaboration on "The Joy of Gay Sex" and the general tone of the rewrite of that major work.
This work really needs to be looked it in that context.
Of course, for those of us who do live proverbially "somewhere just outside of Lausanne" the whole bit of footsie, both saying something and not saying, leaving it unsaid, is part of the pleasure of a very exceptional read.
--S L S
Honesty and good looks. I love you Ed. -13:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)