Comments:Finnish internet censorship critic blacklisted

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Not sure if it's appropriate for Wiki but maybe it should be mentioned that the finnish censorship law doesn't have a clause about pages with links... It applies only to foreign sites and pages that contain pedopictures. Neither criteria fits the page in question.

Down With Big Brother[edit]

-161.88.255.240 22:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amen. Fephisto - (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship[edit]

This is just rediculous. Even when it goes about stuff like terrorism, childporn, or violence, i still have the right to know and look up information about the matter, don't i?

Companies / governments deciding what the public can and can not see / know... This is a very dangerous development.—212.187.26.150 08:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The guy who checked 1000 blocked links found only 2 kiddie porn sites among them. Altogether there were 1700 sites blocked. So theoretically there should have been perhaps 4 kiddie porn sites among the 1700 blocked sites. The program which does the blocking was costing 2 million Euros. My question is: How much work would it have been for a decent police officer to just contact the servers of those 4 sites and the local police where those servers were located? A day or two? Would this have cost 2 million Euros? I think hardly so and 1696 sites would have not being needlessly blocked but thats how a police state works. Just one more reason to be for a free society without a nanny control. Check also on Seaniehunter on Youtube to see what he went through because of political censorship by the Finnish police. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberty21century (talkcontribs) 17:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]