Comments:Former Wikileaks employee destroys unpublished leaked documents
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.
Comments from feedback form - "Very well written, very compre..."
Very well written, very comprehensive, very insightful. I would not have known about this issue if it wasn't for uowakm. 175.32.98.129 (talk) 11:59, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Who/what is uowakm? Phearson (talk) 21:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- The contributor from University of Wollongong who started the article. ;) Ragettho (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Comments from feedback form - "This article has a ways to go ..."
This article has a ways to go grammatically. For instance, what does it mean that he/she has destroyed the leaks TO Julian Assange's site? Do you mean he/she has removed them from the site? Punctuation and capitalization aren't perfect either; it should read, "...between the pair, and has now..."
Furthermore I think this article uses too many quotations for things that could just be reworded.
Also I believe there's more weight put on the perspective of OpenLeaks than that of Wikileaks. SweetNightmares (awaken) 03:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)