Comments:Former chief of Czechoslovak constitutional court murdered

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "never make news or information..."119:58, 10 November 2010

Comments from feedback form - "never make news or information..."

never make news or information subject to bias or business, good luck

178.40.108.138 (talk)19:19, 10 November 2010

It may be interesting that back in 90ties Mr. Valko used to represent he state in case of allegedly fraudulent privatization on Nafta Gbely. Mr. Gasparovic, who currently is a president of Slovakia had been repeatedly accused by media of profiting from this privatization. In fact, they were almost neighbors in residential district near Bratislava. However Mr. Valko was involved in many major legal cases in Slovakia, often involving people who were said to be in contact with mafia, such as "Raselina" case or "Duckeho zmenky" case. Recently he was appointed member of board of directors of slovak gas monopoly company - the SPP. Thus, the murder might be as well connected with certain information he might have discovered there. He was also involved in Tipos case where the judgment on several dozens milions of euro against the state is about to be pronounced by the Supreme Court.

Peachy (talk)19:58, 10 November 2010