Comments:George Bush discusses Iraq 5 years after invasion

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 16 years ago by in topic It may be a success, but what was the point?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Holy carp!!! Bush is an IDOT<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text hereBold text</nowiki></nowiki>

Classic doublespeak. Iraq was more stable under Saddam than it ever will be under this puppet government Bush has installed. Iraq is now just a lab for the terrorists to try out new tactics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply



Can I have some of what he's been smoking? --Brian McNeil / talk 22:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It may be a success, but what was the point?


I don't like war, and never will. This war was an impulse drive by the President to get revenge on 9/11. Although this was noble, after a while, you just regret what you did. — 12:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank God this is Bush's last year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply