Comments:IPCC claims about Himalayan glaciers were not based on science
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Because things liked this is the reason why I have a hard time believing in climate change.--KDP3 (talk) 07:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Shame on the IPCC; it's idiot alarmism like this that gives environmental concerns and the fight against climate change a bad name. Saying the world will end in a half-century is not the only way to get people to pay attention, and certainly not the best, considering that all evidence says otherwise. They're exaggerating the problem, and becase everyone can see through these exaggerations, a lot of people tend to think there IS no problem and that everything must be an exaggeration. This does more harm to the climate than it helps.
/signed. 164.116.47.180 (talk) 15:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)