This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
"newly formed government"? They just had an election, but their government has been in place for like 60 years.
Israeli is not going to invade...It's going to bomb the shit out of them.--126.96.36.199 22:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
What does it give to the israeli military, to agress a country that isn't thretening anyone. No country has the right to attack an other country because of fear. If the Israeli government believes that the Iranian government could be dangerous for them, then they should defend themselves, instead of attacking out of paranoia. This has already been seen 8 years ago, when an other freedom-protecting country reached out to attack Iraq.
Anyways, keep on rolling, have fun, and maybe try to enjoy life instead of trying to defend unnatural political privileges obtained through unfair means, and preserved for unethical reasons.
And we are allresponsible for our own actions, no matter who gave the order.
I just hope that the Israeli military will do what is right for the long term, instead of following orders that do not serve the purpose of life.
Great, this is just what we need to start another war. With the way different countries are allying themselves this could be a repeat of the assassination of Ferdinand. Same old shit, I guess.--188.8.131.52 00:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
You can't defend against a nuclear warhead well, once it's there. The only good defense against that sort of thing is to prevent your adversary from having nukes in the first place. Israel understands this, and they had already used that approach with Osirak reactor in Iraq... looks like now it's Iran's turn. And for good, too - let Mahmud spew his bile, so long as he doesn't have claws... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.108.40.206 (talk • contribs)
Haha, that is ridiculous - Israel is not going to invade, haha. I guess Russia will invade the U.S. next? What they will do is to employ the London Times in their scare tactics against Iran. --220.127.116.11 07:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If war is on the horizon then, let there be no misunderstanding that many will die and the war will not be exclusive to the midlle easter region. The first strike will open doors of hostility all across the globe and many will seek to enter, exploit, or even create thier own conflict. This possibility will not oppose death to many millions of inocent civilians. If that is the case I will hope my country intervenes and shows that this type of conflict that is between two nuclear prepared countries, will only cause death and sadness, May we hope that war does not happen on the predicted scale or even at all.