Jump to content

Comments:Kony 2012 campaign faces ridicule, praise

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "This article only uses one sou..."

This article only uses one source from Indiana who is terribly biased, based on his experience of having visited Uganda twice. While this is an okay source, building an entire article around his opinion is not. The 'Kony 2012 campaign faces ridicule, praise' was misleading - I actually thought Wikinews had a higher standard than this. 203.129.28.190 (talk) 01:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

“If Uganda was resource rich to the degree that Iraq was, in the United States we would be talking about Joseph Kony to the same degree that we talk about Saddam Hussein..."
He also makes some stupid claims. Don't forget that. 202.86.99.81 (talk) 02:23, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, he is right. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 09:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Its actually not misleading. Some people praised the campaign while others hated it. So the title is perfect. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 09:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply