Comments:Libel case against Wikimedia Foundation dismissed
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
- I can just imagine it in court "And the defendant, hereby, is declared no-" "Shut the `@%* up, you fascist Nazi!" "Mr. Godwin, excuse me?" 18.104.22.168 15:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
It appears pretty detailed, and explanatory. Side note, I'm glad it worked out. Trying to suppress legitimate negative press of yourself is a reprehensible thing... 22.214.171.124 21:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- However this also makes impossible to control/dissuade a third party that publishes defamatory allegations on the wikipedia pages. A sad moment when people are not considered liable anymore for what they say...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs)
Comments from feedback form - "This is a lot of bs. Tell it ..."
This is a lot of bs. Tell it to the parents of the kids who hang themselves in closets every day. Wikipedia is for gutter rats. Judge Perri is one of the dumbest judges in New Jersey. —188.8.131.52 (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)