Comments:Mark Zuckerberg named 2010 Time Person of the Year
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Comments from feedback form - "I think that the fact that Jul..." | 3 | 09:37, 17 December 2010 |
| Comments from feedback form - "i liked this info." | 0 | 05:09, 16 December 2010 |
| Comments from feedback form - "Good!Without mistakes that nob..." | 0 | 05:08, 16 December 2010 |
| Comments from feedback form - "the best" | 0 | 05:08, 16 December 2010 |
| Comments from feedback form - "it is great info" | 0 | 05:07, 16 December 2010 |
| Comments from feedback form - "This is the second in a row J..." | 0 | 03:04, 16 December 2010 |
I think that the fact that Julian Assange was placing first on the reader's choice until he was discarded is something worth mentioning.
They didn't mind dropping him from the list when the US government leant om them since anonymous cant do DNS attacks on a magazine.....or can they?
"As a result of the public backlash it received from the United States for naming the Ayatollah Khomeini Man of the Year in 1979, Time has shied away from using figures that are controversial in the United States."
From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Person_of_the_Year
This says it all.
Wow, I was kinda joking. If those are the rules of Time magazine then Bush should have got man of last decade and Assange should get man of 2010. Tbf it is a US magazine, which isn't big here in the UK at least although it is known so i suppose it's not in their interest to alienate potential readers
Good!Without mistakes that nobody can actually could have revised!