Jump to content

Comments:Microsoft waits for death of Internet Explorer 6

Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 79.113.138.147 in topic Comments from feedback form - "Quality article."

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Comments on this page were originally made using the LiquidThreads extension, which is no longer supported. It has since been exported to wikitext, but the export process was not perfect so comments may appear slightly oddly.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "only just stumbled on this pag..."

[edit]

only just stumbled on this page, i think it's great 89.241.200.122 (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Soapbox disguised as a news ar..."

[edit]

Soapbox disguised as a news article - below WikiNews' standards.

And that coming from someone who doesn't even like IE. 208.18.90.115 (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Facebook 'like' 124.182.53.30 (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "good"

[edit]

good 218.248.64.172 (talk) 18:10, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

FF vs Google

[edit]

Nowadays gmail throws lot of errors in FF. They indirectly market FF users to use Chrome. -- Mahir78 (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Something may be "antiquated",..."

[edit]

Something may be "antiquated", [paragraph 1] but it does not mean it is useless. Look-up Classical (adj.). With more computing power, we have high-bandwidth-sucking banner ads, not better A/V or music quality, or ability. Secondly, HOW has it "outlived its usefullness"[paragraph 5]? 76.90.229.237 (talk) 09:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Bah!"

[edit]

Bah! 99.140.90.149 (talk) 22:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "who wants IE6 when we have Moz..."

[edit]

who wants IE6 when we have Mozilla Firefox 4RC & Chrome 10 beta. 219.64.34.54 (talk) 10:08, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "not neutral enough"

[edit]

not neutral enough 112.135.92.193 (talk) 13:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

IE7+ is not available for older versions of windows

[edit]

IE6 is still the latest version available for Windows 2000 (released ~18 months before XP) and earlier. 91.156.60.73 (talk) 11:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Quality article."

[edit]

Quality article. 79.113.138.147 (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply