Comments:Microsoft waits for death of Internet Explorer 6
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Comments from feedback form - "Quality article." | 0 | 16:12, 12 June 2011 |
IE7+ is not available for older versions of windows | 0 | 11:52, 11 April 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "not neutral enough" | 0 | 13:36, 9 April 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "who wants IE6 when we have Moz..." | 0 | 10:08, 18 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "Bah!" | 0 | 22:32, 17 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "Something may be "antiquated",..." | 0 | 09:10, 13 March 2011 |
FF vs Google | 0 | 18:24, 10 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "good" | 0 | 18:10, 10 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "Soapbox disguised as a news ar..." | 1 | 12:16, 9 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "only just stumbled on this pag..." | 0 | 17:14, 8 March 2011 |
IE6 is still the latest version available for Windows 2000 (released ~18 months before XP) and earlier.
who wants IE6 when we have Mozilla Firefox 4RC & Chrome 10 beta.
Something may be "antiquated", [paragraph 1] but it does not mean it is useless. Look-up Classical (adj.). With more computing power, we have high-bandwidth-sucking banner ads, not better A/V or music quality, or ability. Secondly, HOW has it "outlived its usefullness"[paragraph 5]? 76.90.229.237 (talk) 09:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Soapbox disguised as a news article - below WikiNews' standards.
And that coming from someone who doesn't even like IE.