Comments:New Zealand delays emissions trading scheme
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
This is why I voted for Labour. Consdering if responding to climate change is economically worthwhile! >< Im a screaming pinko and my heart twisted when I read that. Is Nationals head always into economy when there is a world at stake? A little bit dramatic I know but you get what I mean. We were supposed to be the ones pushing this, combating global warming, and now we are reconsidering it! Gah.
New Zealand is in a sink hole now :\
--218.101.90.14 01:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a Kiwi but I usually admire them. Rugby and all the rest. However, when I knew that your govt is "hear[ing] competing views on the scientific aspects of climate change", I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. Whose views they want to hear to first? Shell's or Exxon's? Climate change or its causes are not anymore in discussion! -218.95.47.71 04:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)